Rex Dieter wrote:
Till Maas wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 17:45, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> NamingGuidelines (mostly) only pertain to *new* changelog entries.
>> Maintaining old ones as-is is important to see the history of the
>> package. 0.fdr.2 dates back to the fedora.us days.
>
> The Packaging Guidelines describe how new changelog entries should the
> added and this example is used to show how new changelog entries
> should be added. Since it is not correct anymore it should be changed
> to a current, valid one.
No biggie, though that's not one including in the section labeled "You
must use one of the following (changelog) formats"... (:
OK, Guideline updated to remove reference to 0.fdr in changelog example.
-- Rex