Vít Ondruch wrote, at 10/08/2013 04:59 PM +9:00:
> Dne 8.10.2013 09:36, Jan Kaluža napsal(a):
>> On 10/08/2013 07:18 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Dne 7.10.2013 22:24, Toshio Kuratomi napsal(a):
>>>> * Instead we could build for the main Fedora Repo. If we do this,
>>>> the
>>>> spec
>>>> file, git repo name, and srpm package name all need to match.
>>>> That
>>>> means
>>>> we'd have a separate git-level package for each package+scl
>>>> combination.
>>>> So if we had scl-php5.6 and we needed a php and php-gettext
>>>> package
>>>> for it
>>>> we'd need separate git-level packages named scl-php5.6-php and
>>>> scl-php5.6-php-gettext.
>>>
>>> This goes exactly against the basic premise on which SCL were build
>>> and
>>> that is: "The SCL package must be buildable from the very same .spec
>>> file into regular package as well as SCL package.".
>>
>> I'm not following SCL in Fedora, but even the first way suggested by
>> Toshio is against this basic premise. When you have another .spec
>> file in extra branch, it's not the "very same .spec file"
>
> Different branch does not mean the files are different. It is just
> different branch. You can merge, cherry-pick, etc.
Note that this is completely against what you said before:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2013-March/008936.html
I remember that and that still holds. SCL is not my design, though.
Vít