On Seg, 2016-03-14 at 08:54 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 03/13/2016 08:12 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:15 PM, David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au>
> > Hi, I've worked out what seemed to be a correct URL for for
> > rakarrack
> > spec, now that it is accessed via git within the sf website:
> > I couldn't work out how to fit the sourceforce git URLs from:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.ne
> > t
> > or
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Git_Hosting_Se
> > rvices
> > to suit. Any ideas for a standard way to handle sf git snapshots
> > ?
> Move them to github. Seriously. Sourceforge has been playing
> games to avoid accessing content without going through their
> adveritising functions since they were first founded, and I've
> no reason to work with any project hosted there
> since..... checking
> old notes, not since 2009.
Devshare (I think it is called devshare) was a mistake and only happens
on windows, and all the fault can't be impute to sf.net
still is an important organization that support open source and free
Sérgio M. B.