On 04/09/2013 02:10 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 04/09/2013 09:39 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
> On 04/08/2013 02:28 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> Do we really use -core as name of it?
>
> We have to have some name for the original web application without any
> webserver dependency. Ideally, we would just use the package name
> (like "mailman") and "mailman-httpd" for httpd related config
files,
> but this can't be done, because we should keep backward compatibility.
> However, it could be preferred way for newly added packages.
Or skip that backwards compatibility and just have a flag release with
all those changes.
How would upgrade work then? If I understand it well, RPM would update
just "mailman" package, so the httpd config files would be removed
(since they would be in "mailman-httpd" and this won't be
"mailman"'s
dependency). User would have to install -httpd subpakage manually. I
think this is not OK, but maybe it's not problem to do it like that and
it is me who is wrong :).
JBG
--
packaging mailing list
packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Jan Kaluza