On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 21:50 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
Well, with respect to what to do about a guideline for BuildRequires
and
%{?_isa}, I'm back to being confused.
Matthias' comment suggests to me that %{?_isa} should be recommended in
BuildRequires for non-noarch packages; but the ensuing discussion makes
me less certain of that. The result of this uncertainty is that I'm
back to thinking that mention of BuildRequires should be dropped from
this draft and its issues deferred to another one.
_isa in BuildRequires doesn't work atm. and shouldn't be used. There
are possible fixes, but all of them are non-trivial.