On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:14:25AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
On 10/22/2012 10:06 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>On 10/22/2012 03:47 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>commit e00f8293097f8331883f1df35f74be70fbb290b9
>>Author: Petr Písař <ppisar(a)redhat.com>
>>Date: Mon Oct 22 15:46:27 2012 +0200
>>
>> Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host
>>
>> perl-Coro.spec | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>---
>>diff --git a/perl-Coro.spec b/perl-Coro.spec
>>index 50a855d..31589a5 100644
>>--- a/perl-Coro.spec
>>+++ b/perl-Coro.spec
>>@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Requires: perl(EV) >= 3
>> Requires: perl(Event) >= 1.08
>> Requires: perl(Guard) >= 0.5
>> Requires: perl(Storable) >= 2.15
>>-Provides: bundled(libecb) = %(rpm -q libecb --qf '%{VERSION}')
>>+Provides: bundled(libecb)%(rpm -q libecb --qf ' = %{VERSION}'
>>2>/dev/null)
>
>I could be wrong, but IIRC, calling rpm inside of rpm specs is not
>allowed in Fedora.
>
>Apart of this, what you are doing is rendering your built
>non-deterministic - Another "strictly forbidden" item.
Agreed. What you're trying to say essentially is that the bundled
libecb version matches the system/non-bundled version, which really
doesn't make any sense. I'd suggest you simply remove the versioning
(or list the real bundled version some other way).
Also -- did you get a bundling exception for this? I don't see it listed on
the No Bundled Library page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Packages_gr...
-Toshio