On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 00:37 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
Hiyas,
ReviewGuidelines say:
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
I just noticed that there are some files with permissions 0444 on my fc5
system installed, for example manpages:
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 24410 15. Feb 2006 cdrecord.1.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 1229 11. Feb 2006 dos2unix.1.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 1790 11. Feb 2006 hesinfo.1.gz
Are 0444 proper permission bits for manpages / non-executable files?
0644 is traditional but I don't see anything wrong with 0444.
-Toshio