Ralf Corsepius wrote :
You intentional don't seem to be wanting to understand:
I am saying: The FE guideline recommendation supports rebuilding in a
typical user environment. Yours doesn't. As such it is a feature
regression and qualifies as a bug, which is sufficient reason for me not
to approve such packages.
I really think you jump to conclusions way too fast here.
As I already wrote a few times, I get your point, but as the `id -u`
hack doesn't even take care of the default setup (i.e. users need to
manually define a %_topdir anyway), and that I consider the proper
fix to be defining a %_tmppath, I just find it as m00t as it can get.
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 5.91 (FC6 Test2) - Linux kernel 2.6.17-1.2445.fc6
Load : 0.13 0.20 0.19