you don't seriously expect an answer to this email, which I consider to
be filled with hostile and false allegations of yours.
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 14:53 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
a) the raguments were mainly between racor and myself
b) topic was decided on an IRC meeting I couldn't attend
c) The summary of my arguments were given by ... racor ???
d) My arguments were not "I do it with macros, don't care about the rest"
=> Deliberately misquoted?
You could not be wronger.
e) True arguments are that
obscuring the buildroot for the sake of an extremely rare
corner case (several users building the same package on the
same system w/o chroots) implies fixing it for far more not
corner-cases like building i386 and x86_64 packages
simulataneously. So the `id -nu` part is far less important
than adding the target arch, but that was silently forgotten by
You should remember that this had been an IRC, and I was citing off-head.
I remember us waiting for racor to finish with his relocation for a
couple of months before dicussing topics where he was having an
active opinion and in this case it's a blitz decision in absence of
one party. I'm also not amuised by racor's misquoting, be it
deliberate or not.
In light of the above I'd like to ask to rediscuss this.
I don't have a log of this meeting, but IIRC, we concluded to revisit
this topic should something appear _technically_ broken with it.