Hi,
rubygem-activesupport
FTBFS for Ruby 2.4.0.
I uploaded a patch to fix Ruby 2.4.0 compatiblity.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412628
Other rails related packages might also have issues for Ruby 2.4.0.
Jun Aruga
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch(a)redhat.com>
> To: ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 7:07:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 2.4 - Mass rebuild
>
> Just a quick update about status.
>
> So far, we have built most of the rubygem-packages, 66 in total. These
> are the remaining:
>
> rubygem-nio4r
> rubygem-puma
> ^^ There are updates available, so I skipped this. Will discuss with Jun
> next steps.
>
> rubygem-json
> ^^ There is json as subpackage of Ruby and this would need more
> attention, since it is broken already if I am not mistaken => low
> priority ATM.
>
> rubygem-pg
> ^^ {Big,Fix}num => Integer issue. I notified upstream, so far without
> response.
>
> rubygem-rkerberos
> ^^ Does not build on PPC for some reason. Secondary arch guys will take
> a look.
> rubygem-escape_utils
>
> rubygem-qpid_messaging
> ^^ This is broken for ages
>
> rubygem-kgio
> rubygem-pcaprub
> rubygem-posix-spawn
> ^^ I don't remember anymore, probably some packaging issues.
>
> So far the rebuild was quite smooth, but the {Big,Fix}num will cause
> more pain. As of now, I am aware that there are some packages (diff_lcs,
> builder) which are used in some projects and they fire quite some
> warnings (but there is upstream activity to fix this). Due to this
> warnings and this change itself, there might be other broken packages,
> e.g. rubygem-cucumber-wire will be FTBFS due to excessive warnings.
>
> I'll look tomorrow on the non-rubygem packages.
>
>
> Vít
> _______________________________________________
> ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>