Dne 6.11.2011 06:55, Shawn Starr napsal(a):
On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 10:41:47 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi guys,
I have updated the repository to the officially released Rugy 1.9.3-p0. Installation should be now as simple as:
# yum install ruby
Vit
Hi Vit,
If I may request, can we have the Ruby/Rubygem packaging guidelines updated for 1.9.x and compat for 1.8.x?
I have a lot of rubygems to package and I'm unsure if some of these will work for 1.9 and RSPec 2.x standards.
This is in relation to getting OpenNebula 3.x in for Fedora 17 timeframe.
Thanks, Shawn.
Hi Shawn,
Updated packaging guidelines are definitely on my TODO list, I just did not get the chance yet, since the Ruby package itself is still evolving.
Nevertheless, the RSpec 2.x is independent topic from Ruby 1.9. Please go ahead and use RSpec 2.x for all your packages. It should not be any issue.
Vit
Dne 4.10.2011 16:23, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hello,
I have prepared testing repository with Ruby 1.9.3 rev 33347 (i.e. bit newer version then RC1). You can enable it by downloading repo file [1] into your /etc/yum.repos.d directory. You can later install the Ruby package by issuing:
# sudo yum install ruby rubygems-1.8.10-rc1.1.fc17
Please note that installation of fully versioned rubygems is *mandatory* ATM and you have to *uninstall rubygems* package prior installing this test release to avoid version conflicts. This will be fixes as soon as final release of Ruby will be available.
Vit
[1] http://vondruch.fedorapeople.org/ruby_1.9.3.repo _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig