Dne 29. 09. 21 v 14:26 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 12:42 PM Vít Ondruch
<vondruch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Dne 28. 09. 21 v 1:51 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>> Jun Aruga wrote on 2021/09/28 1:54:
>>> Just FYI
>>> It seems the rpms/ruby rawhide started to fail to build from the
>>> following build.
>>>
>>>
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/11069282
>>> autoconf: 2.69-37.fc35 => 2.71-1.fc36
>>>
>>> I noticed this when I also saw the build started to fail on the
>>> stream-ruby-2.6 branch too.
>>>
>> I think Vít has already noticed this and contacted the upstream:
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999479
>>
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18156
>
> Right, I hoped for some upstream response, but my plan is to reintroduce
> the `AC_PROG_CC` if there is no response. Hopefully I get back to this
> soon, because we should look into the OpenSSL 3.x compatibility.
It seems the following patch for the ruby.spec works to build
rpms/ruby on rawhide. Now building is in progress in my environment.
But maybe we don't want to add the gcc-c++ dependency?
```
$ git diff
diff --git a/ruby.spec b/ruby.spec
index 414eb19..c5c6edc 100644
--- a/ruby.spec
+++ b/ruby.spec
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ BuildRequires: procps
%{?with_hostname:BuildRequires: %{_bindir}/hostname}
BuildRequires: multilib-rpm-config
BuildRequires: gcc
+BuildRequires: gcc-c++
I already had discussion on this topic previously:
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/17337
IOW there were attempts to enforce availability of C++ but the patches
were reverted. And I think there was more, but I can't find the references.
BuildRequires: make
BuildRequires: zlib-devel
@@ -619,7 +620,7 @@ rm -rf ext/fiddle/libffi*
cp -a %{SOURCE3} .
%build
-autoconf
+./autogen.sh
%configure \
--with-rubylibprefix='%{ruby_libdir}' \
```
I am not autotols expert, but `autogen.sh` does not do more then
`autoreconf` and as far as I remember, I have tried autoreconf but I
have opted to not use it for some (forgotten) reason. Moreover:
1) The upstream tarball contains the config.{guess,sub} files
2) The `%{configure}` macro replaces the config.{guess,sub} files during
build
Therefore you would need some convincing arguments.
Vít