A little late to the game but a colleague was updating some of our gems using transpec:
> I realize it’s a big undertaking to do this, but it sucks not to
be able to
> run tests in %check because of all the breaking changes.
I could also use it already.
> I plan to update rspec series to 3.x on F-22
Makes sense to me. We were fixing a lot recently.
Josef
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mamoru TASAKA" <mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org>
To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Friday, 27 June, 2014 4:31:20 PM
Subject: Re: RSpec 3
Julian C. Dunn wrote, at 06/27/2014 11:00 PM +9:00:
> Hi again,
>
> I’ve been packaging more and more stuff that is using RSpec 3 in test
> suites. We currently have RSpec 2.14.1 even in rawhide.
> Is anyone working on an upgrade? Or providing RSpec 3 in parallel?
>
> I realize it’s a big undertaking to do this, but it sucks not to be able to
> run tests in %check because of all the breaking changes.
I plan to update rspec series to 3.x on F-22, but not on F-21. When people
are working hard
to fix FTBFS which already appears on many rubygems related packages,
introducing another
breakage at this timing is not I am going to do.
Perhaps on F-22 I will make compat-package for rspec 2 series (review
requests needed, I will
create these), and maybe I will keep these compat-package even on F-23.
Regards,
Mamoru
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list
ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig