Re: Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for F15

[Mo Morsi]

On 01/14/2011 02:58 AM, Mohammed Morsi wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 11:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Are we really going to replace Rails 2.x with Rails 3.0.x or should they
> > live side by side? Your specs shows the later and I am also fan of the
> > later. However, I am not sure everybody else will be happy with this
> > step. Was it discussed before? Sorry, I am not following Fedora Rails
> > development that long :/
>
> Yea, we went back and forth on this a few times and I believe the
> general consensus was to do the update.
> > Dne 11.1.2011 19:11, Mohammed Morsi napsal(a):
> > >  The Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for Fedora are just about ready to go. Please
> > >
> > > look at and review the Specs and SRPMs below:
> > >
> > > Rails:
> > > http://mo.morsi.org/files/rpms/rubygem-rails-3.0.3-1.fc14.src.rpm
> > > http://mo.morsi.org/files/rpms/rubygem-rails.spec
> >
> > There are missing dependency on railties and bundler, where there is
> > enforced reference to rake which should not be necessary according to
> > rails gemspec: https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/v3.0.3/rails.gemspec
> >
> > https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/v3.0.3/rails.gemspec
>
> Good catch on these, I probably already had them installed when I was
> building these rpms. I'll add them to a revised set of rpms which I'll
> send out soon. I also noticed a missing activemodel dependency for
> activeresource (which isn't a big deal since activemodel 3.0.3 has been
> submitted to Fedora) as well as a rack ~>  1.2.1 dependency for
> actionpack. The latter is a little more concerning as the current Rack
> version in Fedora is 1.1.0 and if Rails 3 doesn't play well with this
> (we can try patching rails itself) we may have to update that as well.
> -Mo
>
> ruby-sig mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig

I just ran the actionpack 3.0.3 test suite against Rack 1.1.0 and 
everything passed. Also the Rails 3 commit updating the dependency to 
Rack 1.2.1 seems pretty trivial, the only actual code change is to a test.

https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/f3bb185b03e746b52a4035a6df002597d8552e...

Of course ideally we'd just update Rack to the latest upstream release 
(1.2.1) in F15. Filed a request w/ the maintainer (jeroen) to do so.

-Mo