March 2008 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 437419] Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437419 nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net 2008-03-26 05:12 EST ------- Ok, will look at it at import time New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: edrip-fonts Short Description: Edrip decorative fonts Owners: nim Branches: devel InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: Yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 304441] Tracker liberation-fonts. Bugs needed to be resolved by Ascender.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker liberation-fonts. Bugs needed to be resolved by Ascender. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304441 Bug 304441 depends on bug 251890, which changed state. Bug 251890 Summary: Exchanged and incomplete glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251890 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 304441] Tracker liberation-fonts. Bugs needed to be resolved by Ascender.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker liberation-fonts. Bugs needed to be resolved by Ascender. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304441 petersen(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 304441] Tracker liberation-fonts. Bugs needed to be resolved by Ascender.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker liberation-fonts. Bugs needed to be resolved by Ascender. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304441 ------- Additional Comments From cchance(a)redhat.com 2008-03-25 20:42 EST ------- Since all tracked bugs are resolved closed, this bug should be resolved closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 437419] Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437419 kevin(a)tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From kevin(a)tummy.com 2008-03-25 20:19 EST ------- OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (OFL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 066f36f19f8a5c817028ad5e99210478 edrip-src-20080310.tar.bz2 066f36f19f8a5c817028ad5e99210478 edrip-src-20080310.tar.bz2.sav OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag See below - Should package latest version Issues: 1. 20080318 is out, perhaps update to that before importing? 2. The Source0: %{URL}/%{archivename}.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to work with spectool. Why not just replace %{URL} with the URL. Do you expect it to keep changing? Why not replace %{archivename} with the more standard %{name}-src-%{release} ? It would be good for spectool -g to work with your Source0 line in any case. Neither of those is a big deal, if you could look at them before importing, that would be great. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 437419] Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437419 kevin(a)tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |kevin(a)tummy.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kevin(a)tummy.com 2008-03-25 20:08 EST ------- ok. Happy to review this package now. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 304441] Tracker liberation-fonts. Bugs needed to be resolved by Ascender.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker liberation-fonts. Bugs needed to be resolved by Ascender. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304441 Bug 304441 depends on bug 251890, which changed state. Bug 251890 Summary: Exchanged and incomplete glyphs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251890 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 304441] Tracker liberation-fonts. Bugs needed to be resolved by Ascender.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker liberation-fonts. Bugs needed to be resolved by Ascender. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304441 Bug 304441 depends on bug 240525, which changed state. Bug 240525 Summary: [liberation-fonts] Alignment mismatch of dot accents. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240525 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 437419] Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437419 tcallawa(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|182235 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa(a)redhat.com 2008-03-23 10:38 EST ------- I'm ok with this, even if it does make my head hurt, the logic seems solid. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 438006] New: After `yum install vnc-server' firefox does not run

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438006 Summary: After `yum install vnc-server' firefox does not run Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: If I have some bare F8 system and I install vnc-server there no real application is working there. I must install additional font packages by hand to make it fly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi-7.2-3.fc8.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-Type1-7.2-3.fc8.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-misc-7.2-3.fc8.noarch How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install a minimal non-X F-8 system (I used F8-GOLD in RHTS). 2. yum install vnc-server 3. yum install firefox 4. vncserver 5. DISPLAY=:1 firefox Actual results: Nothing happens. Expected results: Running firefox. Additional info: If you run this point it firefox will run: 3b. yum install xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 This one instead is also sufficient 3c. yum install xorg-x11-fonts-truetype Expecting `xorg-x11-fonts-base' should require/install for example `xorg-x11-fonts-Type1'. Installing `xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi' instead of 3b/3c does not help it. `firefox-bin' writes as seen in strace (hidden by 2>/dev/null by the `firefox' wrapper script): No fonts found; this probably means that the fontconfig library is not correctly configured. You may need to edit the fonts.conf configuration file. More information about fontconfig can be found in t... xmessage will run even without these additional fontconfig fonts but I do not accept such X system as sufficient. Other apps besides firefox also do not run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 2 months

1
13
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs March 2008