[Bug 2184872] New: User installed Japanese fonts override system
fonts when substituting glyphs
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184872
Bug ID: 2184872
Summary: User installed Japanese fonts override system fonts
when substituting glyphs
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
Status: NEW
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bztdlinux(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
When installing a Japanese font locally (using gnome font viewer, which
effectively copies to ~/.local/share/fonts/), with the default fontconfig, all
kana in the system uses that font.
However, it only affects certain applications. Firefox (rpm) and Inkscape
(flatpak) is affected, but gwrite is not.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.14.0-3.fc37.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Download the following font:
http://font.sumomo.ne.jp/fontdata-c2157415/k-font.zip
2. Unzip and install by double-clicking the font in nautilus and clicking
install.
3. Restart Firefox or Inkscape and paste "です” in a field with sans-serif or
system-ui font
Actual results:
Text appears with the new font
Expected results:
Text appears with the normal system font
Additional info:
Running pango-view, e.g. the following, works fine and selects a reasonable
font (Droid Sans Japanese):
FC_DEBUG=4 pango-view --font="system-ui" -t です | grep family
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184872
6 days, 1 hour
[Bug 2112732] New: Fail to build from source
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112732
Bug ID: 2112732
Summary: Fail to build from source
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: campivisivi-titillium-fonts
Assignee: luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
luya_tfz(a)thefinalzone.net
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT.zip contains two directory. one is
Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT which is specified as a base directory in
the spec file. another one is __MACOSX. the spec file doesn't clean up
__MACOSX, thus, the build stop on extracting like:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/rpmuncompress -x
/var/home/tagoh/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT.zip
replace __MACOSX/Titillium_roman_upright_italic_2_0_OT/._Titillium-Black.otf?
[y]es, [n]o, [A]ll, [N]one, [r]ename:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
campivisivi-titillium-fonts-20120913-25.fc37
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.download SRPM
2.rpmbuild --rebuild campivisivi-titillium-fonts-20120913-25.fc37.src.rpm
3.try again once the rebuild finished.
Actual results:
the rebuild always fails except first try.
Expected results:
the rebuild should be successfully finished any time.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112732
1 week
[Bug 2188151] New: Update packages to their latest version
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188151
Bug ID: 2188151
Summary: Update packages to their latest version
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: sil-charis-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com
Reporter: zolikydev(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: aekoroglu(a)linux.intel.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML,
like Gecko) Chrome/112.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Build Identifier:
Hello,
I was wondering if you could update the packages "sil-charis-fonts" and
"sil-charis-compact-fonts" to their latest versions? The current ones seem to
be quite outdated.
The newest Charis SIL font is available here:
https://software.sil.org/charis
and the compact version is here: https://software.sil.org/lcgfonts/download
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188151
1 week, 3 days
[Bug 1833858] New: Hangul Jamo is seperated and printed respectively
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833858
Bug ID: 1833858
Summary: Hangul Jamo is seperated and printed respectively
Product: Fedora
Version: 32
Status: NEW
Component: google-droid-fonts
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: hyunwoo.park(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, oliver(a)redhat.com,
paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1687129
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1687129&action=edit
wrong display of Hangul at LibreOffice Writer
Description of problem:
When Hangul is output to the monitor, Chosung, Neutral, and Jongseong are
output separately.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Font file, /usr/share/fonts/google-droid-sans-fonts/DroidSansFallbackFull.ttf,
of google-droid-sans-fonts-20200215-3.fc32.noarch
How reproducible:
If you create a test.html containing "가속도" and open the file in the chrome
browser, the Korean alphabet will be displayed separately.
Or, write "가속도" at LibreOffice Writer and select font as "Droid Sans Fallback".
Steps to Reproduce:
1. write "가속도" at LibreOffece Writer
2. select the text and change font name to "Droid Sans Fallback"
Actual results:
The text is displayed like "가ㅅㅗㄱㄷㅗ".
Expected results:
Text should be "가속도"
Additional info:
https://kldp.org/node/163247
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 week, 4 days
[Bug 1999078] New: Hinting broken for Bitstream Vera/DejaVu in
Epiphany
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999078
Bug ID: 1999078
Summary: Hinting broken for Bitstream Vera/DejaVu in Epiphany
Product: Fedora
Version: 34
Status: NEW
Component: freetype
Assignee: mkasik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ossman(a)cendio.se
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
gnome-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, mark(a)net-c.com,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, mkasik(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1819062
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1819062&action=edit
Screenshot with varying sub pixel placement
Description of problem:
After upgrading from Fedora 33 to Fedora 34, there is some extremely odd
hinting bug in Epiphany. The same glyph appears with different amount of
hinting in the same line of text, causing a very odd and blurry appearance.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
freetype-2.10.4-3.fc34.x86_64
bitstream-vera-sans-fonts-1.10-41.fc33.noarch
dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-16.fc34.noarch
epiphany-40.3-1.fc34.x86_64
webkit2gtk3-2.32.3-1.fc34.x86_64
pango-1.48.9-2.fc34.x86_64
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Configure Epiphany to use Bitstream Vera or DejaVu Sans Book
2. Configure full hinting
Actual results:
Fully hinted, consistent glyphs.
Expected results:
Some glyphs are fully hinted, some look like they've been offset by a fraction
of a pixel. (See screenshot)
Additional info:
So far I'm only seeing this in Epiphany. I still filed this for freetype since
as far as I know it is freetype that does all glyph layout, hinting and
sub-pixel stuff. Feel free to move as appropriate. So it seems odd that a bug
in Epiphany can screw this up.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 weeks
[Bug 2088665] New: Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters
it doesn't contain
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665
Bug ID: 2088665
Summary: Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters it
doesn't contain
Product: Fedora
Version: 36
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: talk(a)danielflaum.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com,
pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Created attachment 1881507
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1881507&action=edit
A zipped sample PDF and image of relevant portion of PDF when affected by the
issue
Description of problem:
Given a PDF lacking embedded fonts which use certain characters (including →
and ≥), GNOME's Evince on Fedora 36 chooses to substitute the Noto Sans font,
which does not include these characters.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Successfully reproduced by two people independently.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Boot a fresh copy of Fedora 36 (the Live version in a VM will do).
2. Open the attached sample PDF in GNOME Evince (aka Document Viewer).
3. Observe the missing characters in the second paragraph from the top of the
page.
Actual results:
See attached image.
Expected results:
The missing characters should be displayed properly as → (that is,
https://unicode-table.com/en/2192/).
Additional info:
The filer initially sought help at
https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/missing-characters-in-pdfs-since-upgrade-...,
which may be informative in reproducing the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665
2 weeks, 1 day
[Bug 2230471] New: [Lenovo] GB 18030-2022 compliant Chinese font
needed for OS preloads in China
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230471
Bug ID: 2230471
Summary: [Lenovo] GB 18030-2022 compliant Chinese font needed
for OS preloads in China
Product: Fedora
Version: 38
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Fonts
Assignee: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Reporter: mpearson(a)lenovo.com
QA Contact: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The Chinese government have made it a requirement that OS vendors support GB
18030-2022. To my understanding this means that the preloaded OS needs to have
a font that supports this spec and if we don't have that we won't be able to
ship the Fedora OS in China.
I believe Fedora has the google-noto-cjk-fonts package and it looks like they
are working on having compliance for this specification (based on
https://github.com/notofonts/noto-cjk/issues/252)
The font is not part of the default install so I wanted to open the
conversation as to whether it can be included in the default workstation
include please.
If there is another font that is compliant available that I've missed let me
know - this isn't a world I know well (despite, bizarrely, the very first job I
ever had was making it so vector fonts could be rasterised for display :))
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): N/A
How reproducible: 100%
Steps to Reproduce: N/A
1.
2.
3.
Actual results: no compliant Chinese font available
Expected results:Compliant Chinese font available
Additional info:Let me know if there is anything we can help with directly
here. Our team in China can help :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230471
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-...
1 month, 1 week
[Bug 2151945] New: libfontenc-1.1.7 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151945
Bug ID: 2151945
Summary: libfontenc-1.1.7 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: libfontenc
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: btissoir(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, btissoir(a)redhat.com,
caolanm(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 1.1.7
Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.1.7
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.1.6-1.fc38
URL: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libfontenc
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release...
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/1613/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libfontenc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151945
1 month, 3 weeks