[Bug 1423902] New: lohit-devanagari-fonts: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423902

Bug ID: 1423902
           Summary: lohit-devanagari-fonts: FTBFS in rawhide
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
         Component: lohit-devanagari-fonts
          Assignee: [e-mail]
          Reporter: [e-mail]
        QA Contact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail],
                    [e-mail],
                    [e-mail], [e-mail]
            Blocks: 1423041

Your package lohit-devanagari-fonts failed to build from source in current
rawhide.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17735666

For details on mass rebuild see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild

Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423041
[Bug 1423041] Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild FTBFS Tracker

[Bug 1423902] lohit-devanagari-fonts: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423902

--- Comment #1 from Fedora Release Engineering  ---
Created attachment 1253026
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1253026&action=edit
build.log

[Bug 1423902] lohit-devanagari-fonts: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423902

--- Comment #2 from Fedora Release Engineering  ---
Created attachment 1253027
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1253027&action=edit
root.log

[Bug 1423902] lohit-devanagari-fonts: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423902

--- Comment #3 from Fedora Release Engineering  ---
Created attachment 1253028
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1253028&action=edit
state.log

[Bug 1423902] lohit-devanagari-fonts: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423902

Pravin Satpute  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |lohit-devanagari-fonts-2.95
                   |                            |.3-1.fc26
         Resolution|---                         |NEXTRELEASE
        Last Closed|                            |2017-03-14 08:25:06

--- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute  ---
Resolved in lohit-devanagari-fonts-2.95.3-1.fc26.

[Bug 1423902] lohit-devanagari-fonts: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423902

--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
lohit-devanagari-fonts-2.95.3-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-efafcc6538

[Bug 1423902] lohit-devanagari-fonts: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423902

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ON_QA
         Resolution|NEXTRELEASE                 |---
           Keywords|                            |Reopened

--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
lohit-devanagari-fonts-2.95.3-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-efafcc6538

[Bug 1423902] lohit-devanagari-fonts: FTBFS in rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1423902

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|---                         |ERRATA
        Last Closed|2017-03-14 08:25:06         |2017-04-01 13:06:52

--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
lohit-devanagari-fonts-2.95.3-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.