November 2008 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2008-11-15 15:32:30 EDT --- Sorry for the delay here... OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License (OFL) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 7bce211edb964a2c3149e8ae6d46fc6a heuristica-src-20080825.tar.bz2 7bce211edb964a2c3149e8ae6d46fc6a heuristica-src-20080825.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag See below - Should package latest version Issues: 1. There is a newer version upstream, might update to that before importing? 20081109 2. One more thing thats confusing me on the legal front that should be mentioned here: The fontforge script files that are used to produce the font are under the GPLv2+ license. Since they aren't shipped in the binary package or part of the font itself, I guess it's ok that the package license here is OFL, but I thought I would mention it here. I don't see any blockers here... so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 471751] New: Mathematica required fonts

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Mathematica required fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471751 Summary: Mathematica required fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: xorg-x11-fonts AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: q2(a)arachnoid.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=323695) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323695) Small image of Mathematica warning dialog Description of problem: On the Fedora 10 preview release ISO (Fedora-10-Preview-i386-DVD.iso), two font RPMs are not included. The closest matches for the missing fonts are: xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch.rpm xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-9-100dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch.rpm Absent these fonts, Mathematica 5.0 will complain about missing fonts and will render text improperly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Install and run Fedora 10 preview release. Install and run Mathematica 5.0 (this likely affects other Mathematica versions as well). Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install and run Fedora 10 preview release. 2. Install and run Mathematica 5.0. Actual results: 1. Error message at Mathematica startup about missing fonts (see attachment). 2. Improperly rendered text within Mathematica. Expected results: No error messages, properly rendered text. Additional info: Mathematica tends to rely on system fonts for proper operation to a greater degree than most applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 432184] Firefox "organise status bar" extensions conflicts with IcedTeaPlugin

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #29 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-11-14 06:47:45 EDT --- The extension is there https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/1759 I don't think we package extensions yet Anyway the extension works both under windows with sun jdk and linux without openjdk, so I'd tend to think the problem is openjdk-side -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 432184] Firefox "organise status bar" extensions conflicts with IcedTeaPlugin

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 Mark Wielaard <mjw(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|The Visibone font test does |Firefox "organise status |not work with the icedtea |bar" extensions conflicts |java plugin |with IcedTeaPlugin --- Comment #28 from Mark Wielaard <mjw(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-14 06:35:15 EDT --- Thanks for debugging this. Should this be reassigned to firefox? What package provides this "organise status bar" extension? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

rpms/xgridfit/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.4, 1.5 xgridfit.spec, 1.6, 1.7

by nim

Author: nim Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24172/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore import.log sources xgridfit.spec Log Message: 1.11a Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- .cvsignore 1 Sep 2008 15:18:06 -0000 1.4 +++ .cvsignore 14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000 1.5 @@ -1 +1 @@ -xgridfit-1-9.tar.gz +xgridfit-1-11a.tar.gz Index: import.log =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/import.log,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 --- import.log 1 Sep 2008 15:18:06 -0000 1.1 +++ import.log 14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000 1.2 @@ -1 +1,2 @@ xgridfit-1_9-1_fc10:HEAD:xgridfit-1.9-1.fc10.src.rpm:1220282275 +xgridfit-1_11-1_a_fc11:HEAD:xgridfit-1.11-1.a.fc11.src.rpm:1226659397 Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5 --- sources 1 Sep 2008 15:18:06 -0000 1.4 +++ sources 14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000 1.5 @@ -1 +1 @@ -bb2bb3caee51758852902525b068b56a xgridfit-1-9.tar.gz +df07408852d577b1df37d4e4c1361735 xgridfit-1-11a.tar.gz Index: xgridfit.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/xgridfit/devel/xgridfit.spec,v retrieving revision 1.6 retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 --- xgridfit.spec 1 Sep 2008 15:18:06 -0000 1.6 +++ xgridfit.spec 14 Nov 2008 10:43:39 -0000 1.7 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -%define archivever 1-9 +%define archivever 1-11a Name: xgridfit -Version: 1.9 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Version: 1.11 +Release: 1.a%{?dist} Summary: Font hinting tool # This is where we drop fontforge @@ -80,10 +80,14 @@ %files doc %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) -%doc docs/* +%doc docs/* ChangeLog %changelog +* Fri Nov 14 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> +- 1.11-1.a +◮ update for F11 cycle + * Mon Sep 1 2008 <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> - 1.9-1 ᕏ Major update, many changes

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-14 05:37:26 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Nicolas. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hanazono-fonts Short Description: Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-10 F-9 F-8 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net |tagoh(a)redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-11-14 04:42:11 EDT --- This one looks good, thank you for your persistence. You can now continue the font package integration process, starting here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Please do not forget the comps and wiki parts. Reassigning the bug to you since my part is done. APPROVED PS Do not forget to subscribe to the low-traffic fedora-fonts-list, since Fedora 11 packaging changes are being discussed there right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2008-11-13 21:01:19 EDT --- Doh! I should have a look carefully more.. Thanks for catching this up! Hopefully this would be a final review for hanazono-fonts. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-11-13 17:01:21 EDT --- (22:32:08) nim-nim: tagoh3: your first fontconfig rule for hanazo is now fine (22:32:20) nim-nim: tagoh3: but the second one is still reversed (22:32:26) nim-nim: tagoh3: you need (22:32:32) nim-nim: <alias> (22:32:32) nim-nim: <family>[fontname]</family> (22:32:32) nim-nim: <default> (22:32:32) nim-nim: <family>[genericname]</family> (22:32:32) nim-nim: </default> (22:32:32) nim-nim: </alias> (22:32:59) nim-nim: with [fontname]=HanaMin (22:33:16) nim-nim: and [genericname]=serif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-11-13 17:00:10 EDT --- After many more tests it seems the stack is not relevant — I get it both when firefow works and when it crashes However I've found out that disabling the "organise status bar" firefox extensions reliably made things work. Thus I suppose the openjdk plugin does something "organise status bar" really does not like (I've been running this extension for months on rawhide without any problem before I tried those pages with openjdk) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs November 2008