http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20854
Bastien Nocera <hadess(a)hadess.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |NOTOURBUG
--- Comment #2 from Bastien Nocera <hadess(a)hadess.net> 2009-04-20 09:31:42 PST ---
All the mime-types associated with *.otf have magic data associated, so
front-ends should be able to detect which is which by using magic in case of
conflict.
Adding weight for one or the other would cause more problems than it would
solve. So file a bug against the applications that fail to detect the files
correctly instead.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
--- Comment #23 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-19 15:10:49 EDT ---
just for the record, I posted my diagnosis to this problem as the comment to
Bug#492510.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version| |0.3-4.fc10
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2009-04-17 14:04:21 EDT ---
beteckna-fonts-0.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
--- Comment #22 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2009-04-17 06:52:22 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> I am using the latest package in rawhide (devel).
>
> Then perhaps it is 65-nonlatin.conf? :-/
Probably it is. I don't see any fault in the config for wqy-zenhei-fonts except
the numeral prefix maybe?
Anyway it should be a separate issue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
--- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-04-17 02:07:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> > FC_DEBUG=4 fc-match -s "sans:lang=ja"
>
> Which Japanese font did you expect to be selected as the first?
VL Gothic
> Does a japanese-specific fontconfig setting exist?
Yes, vlgothic-fonts should have font .conf.
> (by the way, I really think fedora should have a language-selector-%locale%
> type of configurations for each cjk language, like in Ubuntu, that can save a
> lot of troubles).
Do you have a URL? I would like to look at it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
--- Comment #20 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-16 23:53:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> I still give my biggest suspicion to cairo.
sorry, this comment was actually talking about Bug#492510.
> FC_DEBUG=4 fc-match -s "sans:lang=ja"
Which Japanese font did you expect to be selected as the first? From your
fc-match output, I can't find any specific settings that gives higher priority
for a Japanese font. Does a japanese-specific fontconfig setting exist?
(by the way, I really think fedora should have a language-selector-%locale%
type of configurations for each cjk language, like in Ubuntu, that can save a
lot of troubles).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
--- Comment #19 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq(a)gmail.com> 2009-04-16 23:41:37 EDT ---
if 65-nonlatin has not been changed from F10 to F11, then I don't think it
caused this problem either (while, it did cause difficulties for CJK font
selections as I described in the upstream bug, but that was already taken care
of by the past revisions of all the 3rd party font config hacks, such as those
for wqy-zenhei and wqy-bitmap-song, the only thing we can do better is to
incorporate these hacks into fontconfig upstream, but, this is a different
problem).
I still give my biggest suspicion to cairo.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.