[Bug 490830] New: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830
Summary: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: nafees-web-naskh-fonts
AssignedTo: mathieu.bridon(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: johnp(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
mathieu.bridon(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
Nafees Web Naksha when installed shows only Nafees as font name in font
selection box. When other Nafees fonts installed manually all will point to
same name Nafees in font selection dialog box.This should not happen and should
show all font names from Nafees font family
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.0-5.fc11.noarch
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install this font
2. open this font in fontforge
3. check TTFNames in FontInfo(Ctrl+Shift+F)
4. Look for Preferred Family and Family fields.
Actual results:
currently it shows font name as Nafees
Expected results:
Should show font name as Nafees Web Naksha
Additional info:
Thanks to Muhammad Saad who reported this on fedora-i18n channel.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 11 months
[Bug 478332] New: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478332
Summary: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: urw-fonts
AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Apparently glyph 227 (or maybe 226 according to fontforge) of
/usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022024l.pfb has a width of 740 while all the
other glyphs in the font have width 600. This causes fontconfig to mark the
font as proportional instead of monospace. That then is causing other issues:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17493
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 11 months
[Bug 474514] New: file conflict on upgrading
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: file conflict on upgrading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474514
Summary: file conflict on upgrading
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: dejavu-fonts
AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Bold.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-BoldOblique.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Oblique.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Bold.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-BoldItalic.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Italic.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Bold.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-BoldItalic.ttf from install
of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Bold.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf from install
of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# rpm -qa | grep dejavu
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 11 months
[Bug 541888] New: Fontforge crashes when loading font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Fontforge crashes when loading font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541888
Summary: Fontforge crashes when loading font
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: low
Component: fontforge
AssignedTo: kevin(a)tummy.com
ReportedBy: tobias(a)ringis.se
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: roozbeh(a)gmail.com, kevin(a)tummy.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
It seems to crash no matter which font I try to open. New works.
> fontforge /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf
Copyright (c) 2000-2009 by George Williams.
Executable based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009.
Library based on sources from 22:35 GMT 22-Jun-2009.
Failed to create a fontset for the input method
-urw-urw gothic l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-1,-urw-urw gothic
l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-2,-urw-urw gothic
l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-3,-urw-urw gothic
l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-4,-urw-urw gothic
l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-5,-urw-urw gothic
l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-9,-urw-urw gothic
l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-10,-urw-urw gothic
l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso8859-15,-urw-urw gothic
l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-koi8-uni,-arphic-ar pl uming
cn-light-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-gb2312.1980-0,-arphic-ar pl uming
tw-light-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-big5-0,-urw-urw gothic
l-medium-r-normal--16-0-0-0-p-0-iso10646-1
Help! Server claimed font
-arphic-ar pl uming tw-light-r-normal--13-0-0-0-p-0-iso10646-1
existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing.
I may crash soon.
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontforge-20090622-2.fc12.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install fontforge
2. fontforge /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf
Actual results:
Crash, boom, bang. (See above)
Expected results:
Less crash, boom and bang.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 11 months
[Bug 548323] New: [hi_IN] 0953/0954 Font Shapes need improvement
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [hi_IN] 0953/0954 Font Shapes need improvement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548323
Summary: [hi_IN] 0953/0954 Font Shapes need improvement
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: i18n
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: lohit-hindi-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=378900)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=378900)
Screenshot for Shape different
Description of problem:
Shape of Code Point Glyph in Font is different with respect to Unicode
0953
0954
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lohit-hindi-fonts-2.4.3-2.fc12.noarch
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. type 0953/0954 [॓/॔] in gedit
2. check code chart for those character
3.
Actual results:
Both has different
Expected results:
Need to same shape
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 11 months
[Bug 477486] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: xorg-x11-fonts
AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years
[Bug 499921] New: xorg-x11-fonts-misc's description does not list "Greek fonts"
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-misc's description does not list "Greek fonts"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499921
Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-misc's description does not list "Greek
fonts"
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: xorg-x11-fonts
AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: tim(a)tim-landscheidt.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
The description for xorg-x11-fonts-misc-7.2-6.fc9.noarch does not list "Greek".
Therefore, yum searches for "greek bitmap fonts" fail.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years
[Bug 491976] New: [fonts-ISO8859-2] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [fonts-ISO8859-2] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick up font autodeps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491976
Summary: [fonts-ISO8859-2] Please rebuild for Fedora 11 to pick
up font autodeps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: fonts-ISO8859-2
AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rbhalera(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years
[Bug 523933] New: Unicode 5.1 - Indic Lanuages
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Unicode 5.1 - Indic Lanuages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523933
Summary: Unicode 5.1 - Indic Lanuages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
missing many codepoints class data information
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-1.25.6-1.fc12
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
No support for those characters whose class data is not defined in pango
Expected results:
should support all characters included in and till Unicode 5.1
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years
[Bug 523454] New: [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working properly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454
Summary: [ml_IN] Fontconfig settings for Meera font not working
properly
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: smc-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: santhosh.thottingal(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar(a)gmail.com,
smc-discuss(a)googlegroups.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Meera font has a scaling property defined in
/etc/fonts/conf.d/90-smc-fonts.conf file. It has a 1.2 times size scaling. But
in Fedora 11 this scaling is not working properly. When Meera font is selected
with size say, 12 for the applications, window titles etc, the entire desktop
get ugly with expanded and overlapped titlebars or strings in application.
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open abiword, type two words(english/malayalam), set the font of first word
as Meera 12, second as Rachana 12 and compare the size. Meera font is bigger
than Rachana font
OR
2. System->Preferences->Appearance->Fonts, , select the fonts for all types as
Meera 12. Select theme as Clearlooks. See the panel width, window title width,
the big close buttons etc. Repeat the same with Rachana 12 and see the
difference
Actual results:
Meera font size is big and takes more spaces in application making the
application look bad
Expected results:
Setting font size 12 should set the size as 12 and the size should be same as
other fonts with same size.
Additional info:
None
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years