November 2011 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 757105] no font(:lang=blahblah) generated for Provides

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757105 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Panu Matilainen <pmatilai(a)redhat.com> 2011-11-25 09:03:14 EST --- This is due to a libmagic string change - either the string it produces for fonts has simply changed (wouldn't be the first time) or its identifying some new "subtype" of fonts. Will fix... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 757105] no font(:lang=blahblah) generated for Provides

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757105 --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2011-11-25 08:48:53 EST --- missed one pointer; http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=213066 This release of the font package has, and it has been gone in next build as I mentioned the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 757105] no font(:lang=blahblah) generated for Provides

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757105 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org, | |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje | |ct.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 752538] gtk2 widgets too "tight"

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752538 --- Comment #15 from Marek Kašík <mkasik(a)redhat.com> 2011-11-25 06:05:55 EST --- Hi Pierre, yes, you are right. When considering this again I should have reassigned this instead of close. Will remember it for next time. Regards Marek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 752538] gtk2 widgets too "tight"

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752538 Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|dwmw2(a)infradead.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net | |, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, | |peter(a)thecodergeek.com Component|0xFFFF |dejavu-fonts AssignedTo|mkasik(a)redhat.com |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 752538] gtk2 widgets too "tight"

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752538 --- Comment #14 from Pierre Ossman <pierre-bugzilla(a)ossman.eu> 2011-11-24 12:37:04 EST --- Created attachment 535985 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=535985 Screenshot of U+2551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 752538] gtk2 widgets too "tight"

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752538 Pierre Ossman <pierre-bugzilla(a)ossman.eu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |dwmw2(a)infradead.org Component|freetype |0xFFFF Resolution|NOTABUG | Keywords| |Reopened --- Comment #13 from Pierre Ossman <pierre-bugzilla(a)ossman.eu> 2011-11-24 12:36:28 EST --- Sorry, but I'm not willing to accept that everything's peachy. I'm willing to concede that the fix in freetype is correct and the world is a much more beautiful place now that this bug is squashed (I know nothing about TrueType internals). But if you look at how U+2551 from DejaVu Mono is rendered, then something is obviously off. This glyph is supposed to precisely span one line, so that it will seamlessly connect with an identical glyp above and below it. In reality, it gets a two pixel overlap at 10pt at 96 dpi. If you do not feel that freetype is not to blame, then feel free to pass the buck elsewhere. Either to DejaVu for giving incorrect metrics, or Pango for using freetype incorrectly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 752538] gtk2 widgets too "tight"

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752538 Marek Kašík <mkasik(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alphsteiner(a)gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Marek Kašík <mkasik(a)redhat.com> 2011-11-24 10:15:16 EST --- *** Bug 746920 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 746920] New: autihinting has no effect on DejavuSansMono with freetype 2.4.6 (patch found)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: autihinting has no effect on DejavuSansMono with freetype 2.4.6 (patch found) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746920 Summary: autihinting has no effect on DejavuSansMono with freetype 2.4.6 (patch found) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: freetype AssignedTo: mkasik(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: alphsteiner(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mkasik(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Hello, here is a summary of the problem: - with freetype 2.4.2, DejavuSansMono is rendered normally; - with freetype 2.4.6, DejavuSansMono and the other fonts are rendered badly (badly means here "not in the same way as with 2.4.2"): after some googling, I have found it is due to the fact that the bytecode interpreter is now enabled, and the workaround is to use autohinting: "ln -s /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-autohint.conf /etc/fonts/conf.d/" This works great, but not for DejavuSansMono. After trying freetype 2.4.5 without having any problem, I found it: it is the patch http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/commit/?id=b0962a... that is faulty. Without it, DejavuSansMono is rendered normally using the last 2.4.6 sources and autohinting. Regards, Alphonse -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 752538] gtk2 widgets too "tight"

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752538 Marek Kašík <mkasik(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2011-11-24 09:57:34 --- Comment #11 from Marek Kašík <mkasik(a)redhat.com> 2011-11-24 09:57:34 EST --- Hi Pierre, this behaviour was introduced by this commit http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/commit/?id=b0962a... to freetype. The old behaviour was incorrect. The change was also discussed here: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?34507, http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?33939 and http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?34156. So it is not a bug in freetype. The only problematic thing here is the marker but it is probably a problem in gnome-terminal or pango. Regards Marek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs November 2011