[Bug 499790] New: [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499790
Summary: [te_IN][pango]GSUB delete key can't delete the whole
char in f10,but works well in rhel5.3
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: i386
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: kxiong(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
GSUB press Delete key to delete the whole char,it can't delete the whole char
in f10,but works well in rhel5.3.
I think it is a regression bug.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386
pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.In gedit input U+0C15 U+0C4D U+0C15
2.Press Delete key to delete the char
3.
Actual results:
It can't delete the whole char,it will delete part of the char
Expected results:
It will delete the whole char.
Additional info:
All of chars in [te_IN][GSUB] has the same problem.
But in rhel 5.3 they work well.
So I think it is a regression problem.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 6 months
[Bug 22621] New: RFE: Add font autoinstallation support
by bugzilla-daemon＠webkit.org
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22621
Summary: RFE: Add font autoinstallation support
Product: WebKit
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: Enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: Text
AssignedTo: webkit-unassigned(a)lists.webkit.org
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
The Linux platform is gaining an on-demand font autoinstallation framework (BSD
and Solaris will probably follow eventually).
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AutomaticFontInstallation
Webkit browsers should be plugged into it and use it to request the fonts the
pages they render need. This would have a huge user impact, especially for
pages that have strong i18n constrains.
Unlike proposals such as @font-face and EOT the fonts are sourced from trusted
user-controlled sources, are properly vetted legal-side, use the latest font
versions not old obsolete ones (with bug fixes), and are installed system-wide
where other apps can take advantage of them.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
9 years, 10 months
[Bug 543906] New: Conjunct 'sple' (as in display) is not rendered correctly with Meera font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Conjunct 'sple' (as in display) is not rendered correctly with Meera font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543906
Summary: Conjunct 'sple' (as in display) is not rendered
correctly with Meera font
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: smc-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: parimbra(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar(a)gmail.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Meera font shipped with Fedora does not display the conjunct 'sple' correctly.
It is working correctly with other fonts and same font in debian.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. open gedit
2. select Meera font
3. type ഡിസ്പ്ലെ (സ്പ്ലെ = unicode raw 0d38, 0d4d, 0d2a, 0d4d, 0d32)
Actual results:
സ്പ and ലെ displayed separately
Expected results:
സ് and പ്ലെ rendered separately
Additional info:
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?28043
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years
[Bug 473842] New: Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473842
Summary: Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: medium
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: cchance(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: simos.bugzilla(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cchance(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
The Liberation fonts are missing the Greek Polytonic characters (Greek Extended
Unicode group).
In practical terms, the Greek Extended Unicode group is made of the Greek
characters with a variety of accents (they are precomposed characters).
This report is to track the process of adding support.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years
[Bug 873635] New: [ml_IN] Meera and Rachana rendering issues with Harfbuzz
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
Bug ID: 873635
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nav007(a)gmail.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar(a)gmail.com
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Summary: [ml_IN] Meera and Rachana rendering issues with
Harfbuzz
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: apeter(a)redhat.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: smc-fonts
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
Harfbuzz rendering with Meera and Rachana fonts fail for the following cases
with test case numbers here
http://silpa.org.in/pub/tests/hb/ml/hbview_test_results-2012-11-06/hbview...:
Meera:
2. അഥൎവ്വം (ൎdot reph is positioned correctly, but വ്വം is incorrect)
15. ക്ത്ര
19. ഖ്ര
55. സ്പ്ലേ
Rachana:
1. അൎത്ഥം (dot reph not formed)
2. അഥൎവ്വം ((dot reph not formed)
15. ക്ത്ര
19. ഖ്ര
53. സ്പ്രി
54. സ്പ്രേ (Meera does it right)
Thanks
Ani
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 1 month
[Bug 706559] New: Font variants not used correctly
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Font variants not used correctly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706559
Summary: Font variants not used correctly
Product: Fedora
Version: 15
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: dwmw2(a)infradead.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
I have installed some company-provided fonts for use in presentations etc.:
$ ls /usr/share/fonts/neo-sans-intel/
NeoSansIntel-Italic.ttf NeoSansIntel-MediumItalic.ttf
NeoSansIntel-LightItalic.ttf NeoSansIntel-Medium.ttf
NeoSansIntel-Light.ttf NeoSansIntel.ttf
In LibreOffice I have a choice of three separate fonts: Neo Sans Intel, Neo
Sans Intel Medium, and Neo Sans Intel Light.
For each of those three, the italic version of the font (from the separate TTF
file) is used. I can tell by the tail on the 'f' character. For bold text,
however, an 'emboldening' algorithm seems to be used instead of using the
appropriate separate font file.
In GNOME font selection dialogs, I see just one 'Neo Sans Intel' family, with a
choice of 8 styles. I'll ignore the italic versions since those do actually
seem to work as expected, so there are four weights listed:
- Light (== Neo Sans Intel Light)
- Regular (== Neo Sans Intel Medium)
- Medium (== Neo Sans Intel Medium)
- Bold (== Neo Sans Intel Medium + emboldening algorithm?)
I *don't* seem to have an option in GNOME which will just use the straight 'Neo
Sans Intel' font.
So both seem to be getting it wrong, in different ways. Or perhaps there's
something wrong with the fonts themselves?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 2 months
[Bug 891457] New: [Regression] Chinese emulated Bold uneven and no longer works
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891457
Bug ID: 891457
Summary: [Regression] Chinese emulated Bold uneven and no
longer works
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: fontconfig
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: htl10(a)users.sourceforge.net
Created attachment 671807
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=671807&action=edit
the test.Rnw file mentioned
Description of problem:
R has a way of generating pdf plots with Chinese annotations via cairo. The
plot titles are in sans:style=Bold, I believe. In F17 WenQuanYi Zen Hei is
subsetted and embedded as truetype. But in F18, an unknown bitmap is embedded
as CairoFont-?-? .
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fontconfig-2.10.2-1.fc18.x86_64
cairo-1.12.8-1.fc18.x86_64
freetype-2.4.10-2.fc18.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. run "R --vanilla CMD Sweave test.Rnw" (test.Rnw will be attached)
2. look at the test-002.pdf generated.
3.
Actual results:
Uneven boldening title
Expected results:
even boldening of the title
Additional info:
You need to run R under R to do this ; xvfb-run could be used for headless
system.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4XoE2ifmbw&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 3 months
[Bug 880473] New: Can we drop Conflicts: dejavu-fonts from spec file?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880473
Bug ID: 880473
Summary: Can we drop Conflicts: dejavu-fonts from spec file?
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: dejavu-fonts
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
while running fedora-review on dejavu-fonts, got following error
- Package does not generate any conflict.
Note: Package contains Conflicts: tag(s) needing fix or justification.
Do we still need conflicts for Fedora 11 packages?
Conflicts: dejavu-fonts < 2.26-3
Conflicts: dejavu-fonts-experimental < 2.26-3
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
dejavu-fonts-2.33-4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 4 months