[Bug 873635] New: [ml_IN] Meera and Rachana rendering issues with Harfbuzz
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635
Bug ID: 873635
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nav007(a)gmail.com,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar(a)gmail.com
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Summary: [ml_IN] Meera and Rachana rendering issues with
Harfbuzz
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: apeter(a)redhat.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: smc-fonts
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
Harfbuzz rendering with Meera and Rachana fonts fail for the following cases
with test case numbers here
http://silpa.org.in/pub/tests/hb/ml/hbview_test_results-2012-11-06/hbview...:
Meera:
2. അഥൎവ്വം (ൎdot reph is positioned correctly, but വ്വം is incorrect)
15. ക്ത്ര
19. ഖ്ര
55. സ്പ്ലേ
Rachana:
1. അൎത്ഥം (dot reph not formed)
2. അഥൎവ്വം ((dot reph not formed)
15. ക്ത്ര
19. ഖ്ര
53. സ്പ്രി
54. സ്പ്രേ (Meera does it right)
Thanks
Ani
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 2 months
[Bug 1013183] New: Samvruthokaram ligature is wrong
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013183
Bug ID: 1013183
Summary: Samvruthokaram ligature is wrong
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Samvruthokaram ligature should not happen
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
ligature is happening with VS_U + VIRAWA.
Expected results:
Ligature should not happen
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=K5L012HSi0&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 2 months
[Bug 1017016] New: [ml_IN] glyph of Lohit Malayalam digit nine 0d6f should not be confusable with chillu N 0d7b
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017016
Bug ID: 1017016
Summary: [ml_IN] glyph of Lohit Malayalam digit nine 0d6f
should not be confusable with chillu N 0d7b
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
As of current lohit git version, Lohit Malayalam digit nine 0d6f is almost
identical to the glyph of chillu N 0d7b. Please compare the Unicode Malayalam
chart. The chillu characters have a swish "tail" on the right which bends to
the left at its ending. However the end stroke of digit nine should go straight
up and should not have a swish. (Also note 0d79 Malayalam Date Mark where it
goes straight to the right.)
Please fix it so that the endstroke of digit nine goes straight up and not like
chillu N.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.5.4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5YTyYitP6q&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 3 months
[Bug 995790] New: Wrong rendering for സ്റ്റ asa
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995790
Bug ID: 995790
Summary: Wrong rendering for സ്റ്റ asa
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: anivar.aravind(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Rendering is wrong for
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5vQbENJG8r&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 3 months
[Bug 960212] New: Broken ė in DejaVu Sans Bold and Italic
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960212
Bug ID: 960212
Summary: Broken ė in DejaVu Sans Bold and Italic
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: dejavu-fonts
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
Reporter: mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk,
peter(a)thecodergeek.com
Category: ---
Created attachment 744278
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=744278&action=edit
Screendump showing the letter ė in DejaVu Sans at various sizes
Description of problem:
The letter ė is broken in DejaVu Sans on small sizes of the Italic font and the
Bold font. The attachment shows a screendump of the letters ėĖ in sizes 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 and 16 in DejaVu Sans. The first row shows Regular, then Italic,
than Bold and last Bold Italic.
Sizes 8-12 of the Bold font and 8-13 of the Italic font shows the dot above as
a vertical line starting where the dot is supposed to be and ending at the
baseline. Larger sizes look OK, as do all sizes of Regular and Bold Italic. The
capital Ė looks OK everywhere.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
dejavu-sans-fonts-2.33-4.fc18.noarch
How reproducible:
Always. It is seen in multiple applications. The screenshot is done in Libre
Office, but the same thing happens in e.g. firefox.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=I3883HddAH&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 3 months
[Bug 706559] New: Font variants not used correctly
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Font variants not used correctly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706559
Summary: Font variants not used correctly
Product: Fedora
Version: 15
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: fontconfig
AssignedTo: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: dwmw2(a)infradead.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
I have installed some company-provided fonts for use in presentations etc.:
$ ls /usr/share/fonts/neo-sans-intel/
NeoSansIntel-Italic.ttf NeoSansIntel-MediumItalic.ttf
NeoSansIntel-LightItalic.ttf NeoSansIntel-Medium.ttf
NeoSansIntel-Light.ttf NeoSansIntel.ttf
In LibreOffice I have a choice of three separate fonts: Neo Sans Intel, Neo
Sans Intel Medium, and Neo Sans Intel Light.
For each of those three, the italic version of the font (from the separate TTF
file) is used. I can tell by the tail on the 'f' character. For bold text,
however, an 'emboldening' algorithm seems to be used instead of using the
appropriate separate font file.
In GNOME font selection dialogs, I see just one 'Neo Sans Intel' family, with a
choice of 8 styles. I'll ignore the italic versions since those do actually
seem to work as expected, so there are four weights listed:
- Light (== Neo Sans Intel Light)
- Regular (== Neo Sans Intel Medium)
- Medium (== Neo Sans Intel Medium)
- Bold (== Neo Sans Intel Medium + emboldening algorithm?)
I *don't* seem to have an option in GNOME which will just use the straight 'Neo
Sans Intel' font.
So both seem to be getting it wrong, in different ways. Or perhaps there's
something wrong with the fonts themselves?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10 years, 3 months
[Bug 922357] New: [abrt] fontforge-20120731b-4.fc18: glyphmatches: Process /usr/bin/fontforge was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922357
Bug ID: 922357
Summary: [abrt] fontforge-20120731b-4.fc18: glyphmatches:
Process /usr/bin/fontforge was killed by signal 11
(SIGSEGV)
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: fontforge
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com
Reporter: magicant.starmen(a)nifty.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
FontForge crashed when I tried to create a TTC file, merging four large
Japanese fonts.
I selected "File" -> "Generate TTC" and clicked "Save." Then FontForge freezed
for a few seconds and crashed. It left an empty (zero-byte) TTC file as output.
Version-Release number of selected component:
fontforge-20120731b-4.fc18
Additional info:
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline: fontforge meiryo001x.ttf meiryo002x.ttf meiryo003x.ttf
meiryo004x.ttf
crash_function: glyphmatches
executable: /usr/bin/fontforge
kernel: 3.8.2-206.fc18.x86_64
uid: 1000
Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
#0 glyphmatches at tottf.c:6454
#2 hashglyphfound at tottf.c:6486
#3 ttc_prep at tottf.c:6621
#4 WriteTTC at tottf.c:7073
#5 DoSave at savefontdlg.c:1587
#6 GFD_exists at savefontdlg.c:1631
#7 _gio_file_statfile at giofile.c:184
#8 _GIO_localDispatch at giofile.c:237
#9 _GFD_SaveOk at savefontdlg.c:1668
#10 GFD_SaveOk at savefontdlg.c:1679
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XgiD0GBOMq&a=cc_unsubscribe
10 years, 3 months