December 2013 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1040287] New: [or_IN][lohit] - Change language name from "Oriya" to "Odia"

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040287 Bug ID: 1040287 Summary: [or_IN][lohit] - Change language name from "Oriya" to "Odia" Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: lohit-oriya-fonts Keywords: i18n Severity: low Priority: medium Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: smaitra(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Upstream bug reference : https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15601 Preface : As per the Govt of India record, the State name of Orissa has been replaced with Odisha (hopefully I am correct with its spelling) and the language of Odisha State which was Oriya earlier, has been replaced with Odia. Please change the word "Oriya" occurrences to "Odia" in SPEC file. Please try to convince upstream as well, to change the font name from "lohit-oriya" to "lohit-odia" and rename the package name from "lohit-oriya-fonts" to "lohit-odia-fonts". Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-oriya-fonts-2.5.4.1-2.fc20 How reproducible: N/A Steps to Reproduce: N/A 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Please see the description Expected results: Please see the description. Additional info: References: http://orissamatters.com/2011/11/07/orissa-became-odisha/ http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/parliament-passes-bill-to-change-orissa... http://orissa.gov.in/e-magazine/Orissareview/2011/Nov/engpdf/9-17.pdf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RkdLkU0kNp&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 2 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1047373] New: [pa_IN] Rename Punjabi Fonts to Gurmukhi script

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047373 Bug ID: 1047373 Summary: [pa_IN] Rename Punjabi Fonts to Gurmukhi script Product: Fedora Version: 20 Component: lohit-punjabi-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: aalam(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Description of problem: As fonts are for script, so it will be good if we change Punjabi Font name to "Gurmukhi" for clear confusion regarding Punjabi. As Punjabi is Language, but there are two or three Scripts for it to Write. 1 - Gurmukhi (Eastern Punjab) 2 - Shahmukhi (Arabic based) - Western Punjabi Following is Reference from Unicode, where it is clearly mentioned as "Gurmukhi" http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0A00.pdf Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-punjabi-fonts-2.5.3-3.fc20.noarch How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum list lohit-punjabi-fonts 2. 3. Actual results: Lohit font name is "lohit punjabi fonts" Expected results: Font should renames as "Lohit-gurmukhi-fonts" Additional info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punjabi_language http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurmukh%C4%AB_alphabet As fedora 20 released, so we have time before Fedora 21 to find and fix bugs if changes are included. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xesouNQdVs&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 2 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 873635] New: [ml_IN] Meera and Rachana rendering issues with Harfbuzz

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873635 Bug ID: 873635 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nav007(a)gmail.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar(a)gmail.com Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Summary: [ml_IN] Meera and Rachana rendering issues with Harfbuzz Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: apeter(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: smc-fonts Product: Fedora Description of problem: Harfbuzz rendering with Meera and Rachana fonts fail for the following cases with test case numbers here http://silpa.org.in/pub/tests/hb/ml/hbview_test_results-2012-11-06/hbview...: Meera: 2. അഥൎവ്വം (ൎdot reph is positioned correctly, but വ്വം is incorrect) 15. ക്ത്ര 19. ഖ്ര 55. സ്പ്ലേ Rachana: 1. അൎത്ഥം (dot reph not formed) 2. അഥൎവ്വം ((dot reph not formed) 15. ക്ത്ര 19. ഖ്ര 53. സ്പ്രി 54. സ്പ്രേ (Meera does it right) Thanks Ani -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

10 years, 2 months

1
25
0 / 0

[Bug 1013183] New: Samvruthokaram ligature is wrong

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013183 Bug ID: 1013183 Summary: Samvruthokaram ligature is wrong Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Samvruthokaram ligature should not happen Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: ligature is happening with VS_U + VIRAWA. Expected results: Ligature should not happen Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=K5L012HSi0&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 3 months

1
19
0 / 0

[Bug 1026871] New: math rendering using stix-fonts in Firefox is broken

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026871 Bug ID: 1026871 Summary: math rendering using stix-fonts in Firefox is broken Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: stix-fonts Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: m(a)matejsmid.cz QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, sochotni(a)redhat.com Created attachment 819813 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=819813&action=edit Firefox rendeding of http://www.mathjax.org/demos/tex-samples/ wtih stix-fonts installed Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=k5z5mXjsQf&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 3 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 1017016] New: [ml_IN] glyph of Lohit Malayalam digit nine 0d6f should not be confusable with chillu N 0d7b

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017016 Bug ID: 1017016 Summary: [ml_IN] glyph of Lohit Malayalam digit nine 0d6f should not be confusable with chillu N 0d7b Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Description of problem: As of current lohit git version, Lohit Malayalam digit nine 0d6f is almost identical to the glyph of chillu N 0d7b. Please compare the Unicode Malayalam chart. The chillu characters have a swish "tail" on the right which bends to the left at its ending. However the end stroke of digit nine should go straight up and should not have a swish. (Also note 0d79 Malayalam Date Mark where it goes straight to the right.) Please fix it so that the endstroke of digit nine goes straight up and not like chillu N. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.5.4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5YTyYitP6q&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 3 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 995790] New: Wrong rendering for സ്റ്റ asa

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995790 Bug ID: 995790 Summary: Wrong rendering for സ്റ്റ asa Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts Severity: medium Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: anivar.aravind(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Rendering is wrong for Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5vQbENJG8r&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 3 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 960212] New: Broken ė in DejaVu Sans Bold and Italic

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960212 Bug ID: 960212 Summary: Broken ė in DejaVu Sans Bold and Italic Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: dejavu-fonts Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net Reporter: mattias.ellert(a)fysast.uu.se QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, peter(a)thecodergeek.com Category: --- Created attachment 744278 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=744278&action=edit Screendump showing the letter ė in DejaVu Sans at various sizes Description of problem: The letter ė is broken in DejaVu Sans on small sizes of the Italic font and the Bold font. The attachment shows a screendump of the letters ėĖ in sizes 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 and 16 in DejaVu Sans. The first row shows Regular, then Italic, than Bold and last Bold Italic. Sizes 8-12 of the Bold font and 8-13 of the Italic font shows the dot above as a vertical line starting where the dot is supposed to be and ending at the baseline. Larger sizes look OK, as do all sizes of Regular and Bold Italic. The capital Ė looks OK everywhere. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dejavu-sans-fonts-2.33-4.fc18.noarch How reproducible: Always. It is seen in multiple applications. The screenshot is done in Libre Office, but the same thing happens in e.g. firefox. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=I3883HddAH&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 3 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 706559] New: Font variants not used correctly

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Font variants not used correctly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706559 Summary: Font variants not used correctly Product: Fedora Version: 15 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwmw2(a)infradead.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: behdad(a)fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- I have installed some company-provided fonts for use in presentations etc.: $ ls /usr/share/fonts/neo-sans-intel/ NeoSansIntel-Italic.ttf NeoSansIntel-MediumItalic.ttf NeoSansIntel-LightItalic.ttf NeoSansIntel-Medium.ttf NeoSansIntel-Light.ttf NeoSansIntel.ttf In LibreOffice I have a choice of three separate fonts: Neo Sans Intel, Neo Sans Intel Medium, and Neo Sans Intel Light. For each of those three, the italic version of the font (from the separate TTF file) is used. I can tell by the tail on the 'f' character. For bold text, however, an 'emboldening' algorithm seems to be used instead of using the appropriate separate font file. In GNOME font selection dialogs, I see just one 'Neo Sans Intel' family, with a choice of 8 styles. I'll ignore the italic versions since those do actually seem to work as expected, so there are four weights listed: - Light (== Neo Sans Intel Light) - Regular (== Neo Sans Intel Medium) - Medium (== Neo Sans Intel Medium) - Bold (== Neo Sans Intel Medium + emboldening algorithm?) I *don't* seem to have an option in GNOME which will just use the straight 'Neo Sans Intel' font. So both seem to be getting it wrong, in different ways. Or perhaps there's something wrong with the fonts themselves? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

10 years, 3 months

1
17
0 / 0

[Bug 922357] New: [abrt] fontforge-20120731b-4.fc18: glyphmatches: Process /usr/bin/fontforge was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922357 Bug ID: 922357 Summary: [abrt] fontforge-20120731b-4.fc18: glyphmatches: Process /usr/bin/fontforge was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: fontforge Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: kevin(a)scrye.com Reporter: magicant.starmen(a)nifty.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, paul(a)frixxon.co.uk, pnemade(a)redhat.com Description of problem: FontForge crashed when I tried to create a TTC file, merging four large Japanese fonts. I selected "File" -> "Generate TTC" and clicked "Save." Then FontForge freezed for a few seconds and crashed. It left an empty (zero-byte) TTC file as output. Version-Release number of selected component: fontforge-20120731b-4.fc18 Additional info: backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: fontforge meiryo001x.ttf meiryo002x.ttf meiryo003x.ttf meiryo004x.ttf crash_function: glyphmatches executable: /usr/bin/fontforge kernel: 3.8.2-206.fc18.x86_64 uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #0 glyphmatches at tottf.c:6454 #2 hashglyphfound at tottf.c:6486 #3 ttc_prep at tottf.c:6621 #4 WriteTTC at tottf.c:7073 #5 DoSave at savefontdlg.c:1587 #6 GFD_exists at savefontdlg.c:1631 #7 _gio_file_statfile at giofile.c:184 #8 _GIO_localDispatch at giofile.c:237 #9 _GFD_SaveOk at savefontdlg.c:1668 #10 GFD_SaveOk at savefontdlg.c:1679 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XgiD0GBOMq&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 4 months

1
2
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs December 2013