[Bug 1496466] URW fonts not available in LibreOffice
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496466
--- Comment #26 from David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] <dkaspar(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Mailhot from comment #10)
> That's a poor situation to be in, but yes the minimum would be to ship the
> OpenType¹ versions as required by Fedora packaging guidelines, and maybe
> hide somewhere the Type1/AFM versions for GS private use (after asking
> Fesco). The first priority would be to avoid Ghostscript blocking progress
> in other apps that want to use those fonts. If that can help you in any way,
> you have my blessing, for the little it is worth.
So, to clarify few things:
* The OTF format files are shipped now as well. I have decided to not create a
special subpackage for the Type1/AFM files, even though I was considering it
firstly. Creating this package would create a lot of confussion for many people
out there, and given current state of the problem I didn't want to add oil into
fire. The OTF files are not so big (for these days), so they are shipped right
along the *.t1 and *.afm files.
* I didn't go to FESco for permission, because it would be a waste of time for
both me and them. There's not other solution at the moment so we could choose
from. Current state is the one that I have to support if I don't want to break
things for our users, and FESco approval doesn't have any significance right
now for this case.
Anyway, please report any problems that you might find. Thank you! ;)
P.S.: I have merged the Nimbus Sans and Nimbus Sans Narrow, as you requested
Nicolas. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 3 months
[Bug 1496466] URW fonts not available in LibreOffice
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496466
David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] <dkaspar(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|unspecified |medium
Version|26 |27
Severity|unspecified |medium
--- Comment #23 from David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] <dkaspar(a)redhat.com> ---
The urw-base35-fonts isn't available in F26 anymore (it was unpushed from
testing repository). However, the package is now available in F27.
I don't want to release the urw-base35-fonts (even with the fix for this) for
F26. The risk of breaking something there is still high, and people now expect
stability from F26, since the F27 is out.
Therefore my target on fixing this is in Fedora 27. I'm sorry for the
inconvenience... :-/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 3 months
[Bug 1530211] New: 2.12.91-2 makes truetype fonts in xterm look bad
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530211
Bug ID: 1530211
Summary: 2.12.91-2 makes truetype fonts in xterm look bad
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: dac.override(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: ajax(a)redhat.com, alexl(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
john.j5live(a)gmail.com, mbarnes(a)fastmail.com,
mclasen(a)redhat.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
with 2.12.91-2 xterm looks unnatural with truetype fonts (stretched)
downgrading to 2.12.6-4 fixes the issue
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.12.91-2
How reproducible:
start xterm, in the menu select "truetype fonts"
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
stretched
Expected results:
not stretched
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 3 months
[Bug 1515679] New: should be renamed to
naver-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1515679
Bug ID: 1515679
Summary: should be renamed to naver-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: nhn-nanum-gothic-coding-fonts
Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pwu(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
As NHN has been renamed their company name to Naver at 2014, we should also
rename the package name because the prefix of the package name is supposed to
be the foundry name. nhn-nanum-gothic-fonts has been already renamed to
naver-nanumm-gothic-fonts. so we should follow on it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 3 months
[Bug 1515676] New: should be renamed to
naver-nanujm-gothic-light-fonts
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1515676
Bug ID: 1515676
Summary: should be renamed to naver-nanujm-gothic-light-fonts
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts
Assignee: pwu(a)redhat.com
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pwu(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
As NHN has been renamed their company name to Naver at 2014, we should also
rename the package name because the prefix of the package name is supposed to
be the foundry name. nhn-nanum-gothic-fonts has been already renamed to
naver-nanumm-gothic-fonts. so we should follow on it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6 years, 3 months