February 2020 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 1795974] Review Request: intel-clear-sans-fonts

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974 --- Comment #3 from Adam Borowski <kilobyte(a)angband.pl> --- Hmm... if you've already did the work, it'd probably be better for you to take it. Our upstream isn't very likely to produce frequent (or any) updates — Intel isn't exactly known for font making. I'm a part of the fonts team of another distribution (one with a red swirl...), but I have never packaged any font for a RPM distribution before, thus teaching me for an one-off piece is probably not worth your time. One improvement your packaging doesn't have is a fontconfig alias from "Intel Clear" to "Clear Sans" (the first name tends to come in documents from Intel, the second is one on publicly released font), but even that I've mindlessly lifted from Debian, so it probably fails to obey Fedora rules wrt. eg. sequence numbers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1795974] Review Request: intel-clear-sans-fonts

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> --- See also: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/fonts-rpm-macros/package/inte... I don’t especially want to end up as Clear Sans Fedora maintainer (I have more than enough things on my plate already) but the packaging will need to be converted to the Fonts Guidelines FPC approved yesterday, as soon as the corresponding macro package hits fedora devel and fedora 32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1795974] Review Request: intel-clear-sans-fonts

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795974 Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org, mavit(a)mavit.org.uk Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |kilobyte(a)angband.pl Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "*No copyright* Apache License (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "Apache License (v2.0)". 24 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/mavit/1795974-intel-clear-sans- fonts/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. fonts: [x]: Run repo-font-audit on all fonts in package. [x]: Run ttname on all fonts in package. Note: ttname analyze results in fonts/ttname.log. Rpmlint ------- Checking: intel-clear-sans-fonts-1.00-1.fc32.noarch.rpm intel-clear-sans-fonts-1.00-1.fc32.src.rpm intel-clear-sans-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation intel-clear-sans-fonts.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/fonts/intel-clear-sans/.uuid intel-clear-sans-fonts.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/fonts/intel-clear-sans/.uuid 0 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8", LANG = "en_GB.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8", LANG = "en_GB.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). intel-clear-sans-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://01.org/clear-sans <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> intel-clear-sans-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation intel-clear-sans-fonts.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/fonts/intel-clear-sans/.uuid intel-clear-sans-fonts.noarch: E: non-readable /usr/share/fonts/intel-clear-sans/.uuid 0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://01.org/sites/default/files/downloads/clear-sans/clearsans-1.00.zip : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 41809a296870dd7b4753d6532b4093821d61f9806281e6c053ccb11083ad1190 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 41809a296870dd7b4753d6532b4093821d61f9806281e6c053ccb11083ad1190 Requires -------- intel-clear-sans-fonts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): config(intel-clear-sans-fonts) fontpackages-filesystem Provides -------- intel-clear-sans-fonts: config(intel-clear-sans-fonts) font(clearsans) font(clearsanslight) font(clearsansmedium) font(clearsansthin) intel-clear-sans-fonts Generated by fedora-review 0.7.4 (54fa030) last change: 2019-12-07 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --bug 1795974 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: fonts, Shell-api, Generic Disabled plugins: R, Python, Haskell, SugarActivity, Java, Perl, C/C++, Ocaml, PHP Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> --- Thanks for the CC Please be aware that FPC approved yesterday a change in Fedora fonts packaging guidelines. They won’t change the packaging style in stable releases, but they *will* change the packaging style and checks in devel as soon as the associated macro package lands in koji (and, maybe also in fc32 for new font packages like yours) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://fedoraproject.org/w | |iki/HfG_Schw%C3%A4bisch_Gm% | |C3%BCnd_OpenMoji_fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1803059] Review Request: hfg-gmuend-openmoji-color-fonts - Emojis with a line-drawn style

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803059 Peter Oliver <mavit(a)mavit.org.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproj | |ect.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1429965] CVE-2016-10244 freetype: parse_charstrings function in type1/t1load.c does not ensure that a font contains a glyph name

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429965 Bug 1429965 depends on bug 1429969, which changed state. Bug 1429969 Summary: CVE-2016-10244 mingw-freetype: freetype: parse_charstrings function in type1/t1load.c does not ensure that a font contains a glyph name [epel-7] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429969 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1446073] CVE-2017-8287 freetype: heap-based buffer overflow related to the t1_builder_close_contour function

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446073 Bug 1446073 depends on bug 1446076, which changed state. Bug 1446076 Summary: CVE-2017-8287 mingw-freetype: freetype: heap-based buffer overflow related to the t1_builder_close_contour function [epel-7] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446076 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1446500] CVE-2017-8105 freetype: heap-based buffer overflow related to the t1_decoder_parse_charstrings

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446500 Bug 1446500 depends on bug 1446503, which changed state. Bug 1446503 Summary: CVE-2017-8105 mingw-freetype: freetype: heap-based buffer overflow related to the t1_decoder_parse_charstrings [epel-7] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446503 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1444911] CVE-2017-7864 freetype: heap-based buffer overflow related to the tt_size_reset function

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444911 Bug 1444911 depends on bug 1444915, which changed state. Bug 1444915 Summary: CVE-2016-10328 CVE-2017-7857 CVE-2017-7858 CVE-2017-7864 mingw-freetype: various flaws [epel-7] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444915 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs February 2020