[Bug 1806024] Review Request: weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts - A
font family in the early grotesque style
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806024
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |panemade(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
Review:
Not going for full package review.
This package follows new fonts packaging guidelines.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking:
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts-2.07-1.20191208gitdcd044c.fc33.noarch.rpm
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts-doc-2.07-1.20191208gitdcd044c.fc33.noarch.rpm
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts-2.07-1.20191208gitdcd044c.fc33.src.rpm
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l
en_US optimised -> optimized, optimist, optimism
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts/AUTHORS.txt
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts/BUILD.md
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts/CONTRIBUTORS.txt
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts/README.md
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts-doc.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts optional documentation files
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts-doc.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C
This package provides optional documentation files shipped with
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts.
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts-doc/DESCRIPTION.en_us.html
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
optimised -> optimized, optimist, optimism
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 8 warnings.
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/weiweihuanghuang/Work-Sans/archive/dcd044c29b6f92f101a...
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
9edc9d0ce7416de04b453f95524b23aa6783d713921e7df2ec1c2442cb65d4ff
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
9edc9d0ce7416de04b453f95524b23aa6783d713921e7df2ec1c2442cb65d4ff
Requires
--------
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
config(weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts)
fontpackages-filesystem
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
Provides
--------
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts:
config(weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts)
font(worksans)
font(worksansblack)
font(worksansextrabold)
font(worksansextralight)
font(worksanslight)
font(worksansmedium)
font(worksanssemibold)
font(worksansthin)
metainfo()
metainfo(org.fedoraproject.weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts.metainfo.xml)
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts-doc:
weiweihuanghuang-work-sans-fonts-doc
All other things like license, config, metainfo files looks good.
Issues:
1) Fix the rpmlint warnings/errors before import of this package.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 2 months
[Bug 1806021] Review Request: wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts - An
handwriting font family
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806021
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |panemade(a)gmail.com
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |panemade(a)gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
Review:
Not going for full package review.
This package follows new fonts packaging guidelines.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts-20200215-1.fc33.noarch.rpm
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts-20200215-1.fc33.src.rpm
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
latin -> Latin, lain, satin
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog
20191208-1 ['20200215-1.fc33', '20200215-1']
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts.noarch: W: unexpanded-macro URL %{forgeurl}
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-url URL %{forgeurl}
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
latin -> Latin, lain, satin
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts.src: W: unexpanded-macro URL %{forgeurl}
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts.src: W: invalid-url URL %{forgeurl}
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts.src: W: strange-permission getfiles.sh 775
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts-20200215.tar.xz
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.
Requires
--------
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
config(wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts)
fontpackages-filesystem
Provides
--------
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts:
config(wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts)
font(patrickhand)
metainfo()
metainfo(org.fedoraproject.wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts.metainfo.xml)
wagesreiter-patrick-hand-fonts
All other things like license, config, metainfo files looks good.
Issues:
1) Fix the rpmlint warnings/errors before import of this package.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 2 months
[Bug 1806018] Review Request: vernnobile-oswald-fonts - A reworked
gothic style font family
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806018
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |panemade(a)gmail.com
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |panemade(a)gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
Review:
Not going for full package review.
This package follows new fonts packaging guidelines.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: vernnobile-oswald-fonts-4.101-1.20191208git5a5fff2.fc33.noarch.rpm
vernnobile-oswald-fonts-4.101-1.20191208git5a5fff2.fc33.src.rpm
vernnobile-oswald-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gothic ->
Gothic, goths
vernnobile-oswald-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gothic
-> Gothic, goths
vernnobile-oswald-fonts.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/vernnobile-oswald-fonts/OFL.txt
vernnobile-oswald-fonts.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/vernnobile-oswald-fonts/OFL.txt
vernnobile-oswald-fonts.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gothic -> Gothic,
goths
vernnobile-oswald-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gothic ->
Gothic, goths
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/googlefonts/OswaldFont/archive/5a5fff234687674f8531a85...
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
e6138d3982041ff3429e26e1814229826ad882b78cbb244a504ba19066c25b45
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
e6138d3982041ff3429e26e1814229826ad882b78cbb244a504ba19066c25b45
Requires
--------
vernnobile-oswald-fonts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
config(vernnobile-oswald-fonts)
fontpackages-filesystem
Provides
--------
vernnobile-oswald-fonts:
config(vernnobile-oswald-fonts)
font(oswald)
font(oswaldextralight)
font(oswaldlight)
font(oswaldmedium)
font(oswaldsemibold)
metainfo()
metainfo(org.fedoraproject.vernnobile-oswald-fonts.metainfo.xml)
vernnobile-oswald-fonts
All other things like license, config, metainfo files looks good.
Issues:
1) Fix the rpmlint warnings/errors before import of this package.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 2 months
[Bug 1806015] Review Request: vernnobile-nunito-fonts - A sans serif
font family with rounded terminals
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806015
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |panemade(a)gmail.com
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |panemade(a)gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
Review:
Not going for full package review.
This package follows new fonts packaging guidelines.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: vernnobile-nunito-fonts-3.504-1.20191208git6d8a4e1.fc33.noarch.rpm
vernnobile-nunito-fonts-3.504-1.20191208git6d8a4e1.fc33.src.rpm
vernnobile-nunito-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US useable
-> usable, use able, use-able
vernnobile-nunito-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US useable ->
usable, use able, use-able
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/googlefonts/nunito/archive/6d8a4e1c00df8b361e59656eee7...
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
000299ba5990dad9362a8256a2d322e95e80da21dedf54834acb7253a840bbd0
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
000299ba5990dad9362a8256a2d322e95e80da21dedf54834acb7253a840bbd0
Requires
--------
vernnobile-nunito-fonts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
config(vernnobile-nunito-fonts)
fontpackages-filesystem
Provides
--------
vernnobile-nunito-fonts:
config(vernnobile-nunito-fonts)
font(nunito)
font(nunitoblack)
font(nunitoextrabold)
font(nunitoextralight)
font(nunitoheavy)
font(nunitolight)
font(nunitosemibold)
metainfo()
metainfo(org.fedoraproject.vernnobile-nunito-fonts.metainfo.xml)
vernnobile-nunito-fonts
All other things like license, config, metainfo files looks good.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 2 months
[Bug 1806003] Review Request: vernnobile-muli-fonts - A minimalist
sans serif font family
by bugzilla@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806003
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |panemade(a)gmail.com
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |panemade(a)gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> ---
Review:
Not going for full package review.
This package follows new fonts packaging guidelines.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: vernnobile-muli-fonts-2.001-1.20191208git580b05e.fc33.noarch.rpm
vernnobile-muli-fonts-2.001-1.20191208git580b05e.fc33.src.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/googlefonts/MuliFont/archive/580b05e1f2ad319cd98a8de03...
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
d6e302974bd518ff215cb0112d576b11afb44847e28559700e434bf01e353449
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
d6e302974bd518ff215cb0112d576b11afb44847e28559700e434bf01e353449
Requires
--------
vernnobile-muli-fonts (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
config(vernnobile-muli-fonts)
fontpackages-filesystem
Provides
--------
vernnobile-muli-fonts:
config(vernnobile-muli-fonts)
font(muli)
font(muliblack)
font(muliextrabold)
font(muliextralight)
font(mulilight)
font(mulisemibold)
metainfo()
metainfo(org.fedoraproject.vernnobile-muli-fonts.metainfo.xml)
vernnobile-muli-fonts
All other things like license, config, metainfo files looks good.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years, 2 months