Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: broken alias line for -baekmuk-gulim-bold-r-normal--20-200-75-75-m-202-ksx1001.1998-0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733105
Summary: broken alias line for -baekmuk-gulim-bold-r-normal--20-200-75-75-m-202-ksx10 01.1998-0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: baekmuk-bdf-fonts AssignedTo: dueno@redhat.com ReportedBy: viy@altlinux.org QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: petersen@redhat.com, fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, dueno@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: ---
fonts.alias define -baekmuk-gulim-bold-r-normal--20-200-75-75-m-200-ksc5601.1987-0 as -baekmuk-gulim-bold-r-normal--20-200-75-75-m-200-ksx1001.1998-0 but there is no such font in fonts.dir; there is -baekmuk-gulim-bold-r-normal--20-200-75-75-m-202-ksx1001.1998-0
# proposed alias fix sed -i s,-baekmuk-gulim-bold-r-normal--20-200-75-75-m-200-ks,-baekmuk-gulim-bold-r-normal--20-200-75-75-m-202-ks,g `find %buildroot/usr/share/fonts -name fonts.alias`
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733105
--- Comment #1 from Igor Vlasenko viy@altlinux.org 2011-08-24 15:02:05 EDT --- baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-9.fc15.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733105
Daiki Ueno dueno@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2011-08-25 04:34:06
--- Comment #2 from Daiki Ueno dueno@redhat.com 2011-08-25 04:34:06 EDT --- It should be fixed in baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc17. I'll prepare updates for F16/15/14 soon.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733105
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-25 04:55:11 EDT --- baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733105
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-25 04:55:21 EDT --- baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733105
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-25 04:55:31 EDT --- baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733105
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-11 23:41:44 EDT --- baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733105
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-13 01:49:23 EDT --- baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733105
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-13 01:55:03 EDT --- baekmuk-bdf-fonts-2.2-10.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org