10:54 a.m.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764
Summary: file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped
with a2ps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: file
AssignedTo: dnovotny(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, dnovotny(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 473302
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
file thinks the pfa files in ghostscript-fonts-5.50-22.fc12.noarch.rpm are
"PostScript document text"
They should be identified as "PostScript Type 1 font text"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
file-5.03-2.fc12.x86_64
Full list:
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrb-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrbo-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrr-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/pcrro-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvb-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvbo-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvr-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/phvro-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmb-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmbi-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmr-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
./usr/share/ogonkify/fonts/ptmri-o.pfa PostScript document text
a2ps-4.14-8.fc11.x86_64.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5:37 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 505764] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764
Daniel Novotny <dnovotny(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |NOTABUG
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Novotny <dnovotny(a)redhat.com> 2009-06-15 06:37:06 EDT
---
Adobe fonts, to be properly identified as fonts, have to have the right header,
for example %!PS-AdobeFont-1.1
The files you list have just "%!" header, which identifies them as generic
PostScript files
so file does nothing wrong: without the proper header it cannot tell you
anything
closing this: the files were created by ogonkify, so you can reassign this to
this component, if you think ogonkify should generate the files with the header
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:56 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 505764] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |Reopened
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
CC| |pertusus(a)free.fr,
| |twaugh(a)redhat.com
Component|file |a2ps
Resolution|NOTABUG |
AssignedTo|dnovotny(a)redhat.com |twaugh(a)redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:35 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 505764] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764
Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|rawhide |12
Blocks|473302(F12Target) |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:07 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 505764] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764
--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2010-11-04 07:07:27
EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora
'version' of '12'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this
bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version,
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12:51 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 505764] file does not identify properly some pfa files shipped with a2ps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505764
Bug Zapper <triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot@l |
|aposte.net) |
Last Closed|2009-06-15 06:37:06 |2010-12-05 01:51:24
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper <triage(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> 2010-12-05 01:51:24
EST ---
Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4899
days inactive
5439
days old
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org
5 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Red Hat Bugzilla