2:25 p.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Bug ID: 1009650
Summary: Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: liberation-fonts
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Reporter: alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Hello,
I have a problem with Italic DE and GE: when I copy them from a pdf produced by
XeLaTeX, they are pasted respectively as Latin G and I WITH MACRON. I'm
puzzled, why does this happen?
By the way, other Serbian glyphs aren't copied at all, but they told me this is
XeLaTeX's fault, not font-dependent.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WUlCWOjbqa&a=cc_unsubscribe
9:51 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #1 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
Actually, George Duffner at XeLaTeX mailing list says the fact they're
incorrectly copied or not copied at all is due to bad glyph naming, see here:
http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2013-September/024745.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nQhfRb7oXH&a=cc_unsubscribe
11:24 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Georg Duffner <g.duffner(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |g.duffner(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Georg Duffner <g.duffner(a)gmail.com> ---
There are actually to bugs present in LiberationSerif Italic.
The one concerns cyrillic ge (U+0433) and de (U+0434) which in serbian locl are
simply substituted with "imacron" (U+012B) and "g" (U+0067). Thus,
when
copy/pasting from a pdf, these two codepoints will by copied instead of the
expected U+0433 and U+0434. To fix this you need to add two unencoded glyphs,
insert a reference to imacron and g respectively and name them uni0433.srb and
uni0434.srb (or some other suffix).
The second bug concerns the serbian be, pe and te. They are named S_BE, S_PE
and S_TE. Applications that rely on AGL-conformant glyph names to identify the
original codepoints read these names as ligatures of a letter S and a letter BE
(or PE or TE). As no BE, PE or TE named glyphs exist in the font, no mapping
can be found and copying will fail. To fix this, the glyphs should be renamed
to uni0431.srb, uni043F.srb and uni0442.srb (or any other suffix). This might
concern other glyphs too (dottediacute should be renamed too, something like
iacute.dotted should work).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wZL3YxWCzW&a=cc_unsubscribe
10:45 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
Agree, i did not considered this point while adding serbian support in
liberation. Now while working on lohit2 project i have started taking care for
it http://sourceforge.net/adobe/aglfn/discussion/discussion/thread/f212153e/
While development i try my best for reusing existing glyphs available in font.
But looks like this will not work in need to create another glyph for "imacron"
(U+012B) and "g" (U+0067) and name it as suggested by Georg Duffner.
I will do this by next weekend.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UOyAGp6k9S&a=cc_unsubscribe
2:43 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
This issue has been fixed in upstream master, will be available with next
upstream release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HUd0fuXhsq&a=cc_unsubscribe
1:49 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #5 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
(In reply to Pravin Satpute from comment #4)
This issue has been fixed in upstream master, will be available with
next
upstream release.
Hello Pravin, where can I find this release so that I can test it?
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NR9ymuC4cv&a=cc_unsubscribe
1:56 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
This is git repo https://git.fedorahosted.org/git/liberation-fonts.git
Master is Liberation 2
remotes/origin/liberation-fonts-1_07_3 is for Old liberation version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gxm6gcz3oI&a=cc_unsubscribe
5:03 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #7 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
Created attachment 886080
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=886080&action=edit
Buggy glyphs colored red
Hello Pravin,
I downloaded Liberation 2.0 and tested it. Unfortunately there are still many
bugs. The buggy glyphs are colored red.
1. BE consistently looks like a GREEK DELTA
2. Alternative glyph for ITALIC SHA is not implemented
3. Liberation SANS and MONO have slanted glyphs in the Latin range, so italic
glyphs should not apply to them.
Moreover, the localized glyphs are impossible to copy/paste from a pdf, only
ITALIC GE and DE are pasted but even then they are incorrectly recognized as
respectively Latin I WITH MACRON and G. I don't know whether this problem
affects only me, please try it yourself.
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dbV0vHzK14&a=cc_unsubscribe
5:20 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
Please test the ttf files available @
http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/liberation/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pouDsAyVrI&a=cc_unsubscribe
5:31 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #9 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
(In reply to Pravin Satpute from comment #8)
Please test the ttf files available @
http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/liberation/
I downloaded this ttf files but I witnessed no apparent change on the situation
described above.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SVvDslLXHA&a=cc_unsubscribe
6:43 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #10 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
It really surprise to me that fixed issues again popped up. No problem
Last week i did release of liberation-1.07.4. Lets work on this release and fix
all pending bugs.
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-t...
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1...
I tested by creating pdf locally, i can copy now Serbian characters properly.
Please check and update this bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=H5CyBeZccx&a=cc_unsubscribe
10:06 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #11 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
Hello I've just checked and:
1. BE consistently looks good now
2. Alternative glyph for ITALIC SHA is now implemented
3. I've still got to question the point of having specific Cyrillic Italic
glyphs for Liberation SANS, SANS NARROW and MONO, since they have slanted
glyphs in the Latin range.
Glyphs that still don't get pasted are highlighted in red.
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=n2NxTBHxfh&a=cc_unsubscribe
1:01 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #12 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
Glad to see BE and Italic SHA working properly now. !!
1. I think you missed attachment here.
2. Can you elaborate 3rd point?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=e0Qrplcf5d&a=cc_unsubscribe
5:02 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #13 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
Hello Pravin,
1. I cannot understand which attachment you're hinting to: I downloaded the
1.04.4 version, isn't this the correct one?
2. Cyrillic Italic glyphs, whether Russian or Serbian-style, are normally
implemented only when the font also has a different set of Latin Italic glyph,
that is, mostly in Serif fonts. The bottom line is it's not consistent to have
slanted glyphs in the Latin range and italic glyphs in the Cyrillic range.
Also, don't forget to give me feedback about the glyphs I highlighted in red,
which I couldn't get to copy/paste.
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VDv103PyPV&a=cc_unsubscribe
5:23 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #14 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Alessandro Ceschini from comment #13)
Hello Pravin,
1. I cannot understand which attachment you're hinting to: I downloaded the
1.04.4 version, isn't this the correct one?
Attachment for glyph highlighted in
red. Now understood you have already
attached it in earlier comment.
Can you try to create pdf again with latest version for same? Will be very
helpful to get new pdf as a attachment.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Z7gIJz0Lj0&a=cc_unsubscribe
5:28 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #886080|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #15 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
Created attachment 888846
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=888846&action=edit
New Attachment with Buggy Glyphs
I'm sorry, it's entirely my fault. I'd indeed created it but then I must have
forgotten to upload it.
If you may tamper with this thread, the best thing to do would be to join this
attachment with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650#c11. It
belongs there.
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pDO7XYl16m&a=cc_unsubscribe
5:35 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #16 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
No problem. I will check and update this by tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=D2PglJhyeF&a=cc_unsubscribe
4:27 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #17 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
Created attachment 891091
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=891091&action=edit
pdf to test copying serbian glyphs
I tested this, there was an issue with Liberation Sans Italic which is fixed
now and i can copy all shapes properly.
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/liberation-fonts.git/commit/?h=liberati...
Source for this pdf http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/liberation-testing.odt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hseDvdW2Yf&a=cc_unsubscribe
4:28 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #18 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
Regarding other query:
So do you means, we need Serbian shapes only for Liberation Serif?
Sans, Mono and Narrow does not required it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QnkBueuMOz&a=cc_unsubscribe
7:42 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #888846|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #19 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
Created attachment 891172
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=891172&action=edit
Newest Attachment with Buggy Glyphs
Hello Pravin,
To me, it looks like things were compounded by this newest release :(
I've also spotted that in Liberation Sans Narrow the be may be a little too
"bolder" compared to other letters, but this is just a hunch of mine.
Concerning italic shapes in Sans, Sans Narrow and Mono, yes, since you chose
not to implement italic shapes in the Latin Range, I don't see why you should
do so in the Cyrillic one.
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=e3UHfOivIm&a=cc_unsubscribe
5:27 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #20 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
Another remark: the Serbian SHA glyph shouldn't be selected by default, it
should rather be accessible as a character variant.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qKgcGBfF5d&a=cc_unsubscribe
1:21 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #21 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
Hi Alessandro,
how about pdf which i attached? in #17?
It working fine at my end. Also i checked the fix required in fonts, so all
is well named now.
PDF output depends upon clients as well you choose for creating it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MvTT7dzlNR&a=cc_unsubscribe
7:30 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #891172|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #22 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
Created attachment 891790
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=891790&action=edit
TeX Source File
Hello Pravin,
Yes I can copy/paste all of the glyphs contained in your pdf, but mine is
processed through XeLaTeX, which patently has some problems with Liberation
Fonts. Hopefully these can be solved, I attached the .tex source file in case
you want to test it on your own.
P.S.
Don't forget about https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650#c20
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dF9iTJ6u7t&a=cc_unsubscribe
7:32 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #23 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
Ah, I forgot: this issue likely boils down to glyph names, because XeLaTeX is
known to fail if glyphs aren't properly named.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RHoUmkgzkk&a=cc_unsubscribe
5:54 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #24 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
Yeah, i remember we discussed this longtime back.
1. Presently we are following naming as per AGL. Serbian glyph names are
exactly same as cyrillic letter with just appended .alt1 at the end.
2. Presently we have added serbian shapes in all liberation variants, as you
said it is only needed for serif. Can you report one bug for removing serbian
characters from Sans, mono and Narrow. In later stage it will ease the issue
since we only need to deal with Liberation Serif.
3. I will create trial font for "Serbian SHA" and provide you for testing with
CV01 feature tag.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=q2fbJihe4p&a=cc_unsubscribe
8:13 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #25 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
Hello Pravin
1. It's strange then: I cannot realize why some letters work and other don't.
By the way, it should be .locl not .alt1 because these are localized not
alternative glyphs.
2. OK, I shall do so.
3. OK, let me know when you're ready so I can test it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jyyikFXTlY&a=cc_unsubscribe
12:52 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #26 from Georg Duffner <g.duffner(a)gmail.com> ---
@Alessanrdo it doesn’t matter if they are named .locl .alt1 or .elephant as
long as what’s before the . is consistently named. The problem must be
somewhere else.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5UvQUM0PkQ&a=cc_unsubscribe
12:50 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #27 from Georg Duffner <g.duffner(a)gmail.com> ---
The reason why some glyphs still canʹt be copied or are copied with some
strange glyphs is because they are encoded in the PUA instead of having no
encoding. I think, the only relevant one is Liberation Serif Bold Italic
serbian ghe. The other serif fonts don’t show problems. And the problems in the
remaining fonts would get solved once the lookup there is removed, as
Alessandro suggests.
By the way, also the fi and fl ligatures should be copied to an unencoded slot
which would be used by the liga feature as the encoded ligatures are legacy
encodings and shouldn’t be used by lookups.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zaErWFLYEU&a=cc_unsubscribe
4:37 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #28 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
Hi Georg,
thanks for analysis and providing solution for same. I will implement it and
do release soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9KrKwK21p2&a=cc_unsubscribe
6:49 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #29 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
Now ghe also does not have Unicode assigned. Also removed serbian locale
characters from Sans, Mono and Narrow.
fonts for testing available @ http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/export/
Let me know if any more issues.
fi and fl ligature has assigned values from Unicode. See
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/fb01/index.htm
So it should be fine.
SHA is still remain. Do you have any font for reference of SHA?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mdhWPszYRV&a=cc_unsubscribe
4:42 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #30 from Georg Duffner <g.duffner(a)gmail.com> ---
Of course there are the correct shapes at U+FB01 and U+FB02. However, these
codepoints are legacy encodings that shouldn’t be used in lookups like liga. In
fact, it’s recommended not to subsitute encoded glyphs by other encoded ones.
The problem in the actual case of fi and fl is that if you use these codepoints
users might run into problems in documents that contain them instead of single
letters or unencoded substitution letters e.g. when searching the document: try
to search this page for the word “firefly”, you won’t find any occurrence. Also,
screenreaders that are used by visually impaired might stumble upon such
glyphs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nU3frr7Jk2&a=cc_unsubscribe
3:15 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #31 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
Yes, i do understand that. I hope Unicode normalization must be handling it
correctly.
From Liberation fonts perspective, we dont have any lookup for these
ligature,
might be because of compatibility with Arial.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wLElQokuoP&a=cc_unsubscribe
4:16 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #891790|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #32 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
Created attachment 894628
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=894628&action=edit
Latest test
Hello Pravin
Here's the new test file. A few remarks:
1. Serif is 100% all right now.
2. Sans, Sans Narrow and Mono all lack the localized glyph for BE: this is not
an italic glyph so there's no reason to remove it.
3. You should remove italic glyphs from the Cyrillic range of Sans and Sans
Narrow altogether. At present you just deleted the Serbian localized glyphs.
Regards
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HrG0z2MuQZ&a=cc_unsubscribe
4:27 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #33 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
(In reply to Pravin Satpute from comment #29)
Now ghe also does not have Unicode assigned. Also removed serbian
locale
characters from Sans, Mono and Narrow.
fonts for testing available @ http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/export/
Let me know if any more issues.
fi and fl ligature has assigned values from Unicode. See
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/fb01/index.htm
So it should be fine.
SHA is still remain. Do you have any font for reference of SHA?
FreeSerif implements it as a character variant, and this is the only free font
I'm aware of with full-fledged support for Serbian. Then there are the paying
fonts but I don't use them so I cannot provide you with any bit of information
about these.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BVptEap5xe&a=cc_unsubscribe
4:28 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #34 from Alessandro Ceschini <alescesc1986(a)yahoo.it> ---
(In reply to Pravin Satpute from comment #29)
SHA is still remain. Do you have any font for reference of SHA?
FreeSerif implements it as a character variant, and this is the only free font
I'm aware of with full-fledged support for Serbian. Then there are the paying
fonts but I don't use them so I cannot provide you with any bit of information
about these.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Vv2yCSXjTo&a=cc_unsubscribe
4:35 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #35 from Fedora End Of Life <endoflife(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora
has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is
Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no
longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will
be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=v19rINuW7u&a=cc_unsubscribe
5:13 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Fedora End Of Life <endoflife(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed| |2015-02-18 06:13:59
--- Comment #36 from Fedora End Of Life <endoflife(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
Fedora 19 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-01-06. Fedora 19 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=z7KlCotGzX&a=cc_unsubscribe
5:16 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|EOL |---
Keywords| |Reopened
--- Comment #37 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
I have Liberation release pending with improvement. Hoping to do it soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=laRstXEi7P&a=cc_unsubscribe
8:01 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jreznik(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #38 from Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Pravin Satpute from comment #37)
I have Liberation release pending with improvement. Hoping to do it
soon.
Could you please change version to the release you'd like to release in? Fedora
19 is now EOL, so no updates are possible. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4q7PYyK5WB&a=cc_unsubscribe
9:04 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|19 |22
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FeNeTCq1CH&a=cc_unsubscribe
5:24 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Fedora End Of Life <jkurik(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed|2015-02-18 06:13:59 |2016-07-19 06:24:39
--- Comment #39 from Fedora End Of Life <jkurik(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:20 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|22 |24
Resolution|EOL |---
--- Comment #40 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
Some part is already fixed in upstream. Need to apply it in downstream with
release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:57 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Krasnaya Ploshchad’ <shanshandehongxing_1234(a)hotmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |shanshandehongxing_1234@hot
| |mail.com
--- Comment #41 from Krasnaya Ploshchad’ <shanshandehongxing_1234(a)hotmail.com> ---
A sample for Serbian glyphs available here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Special_Cyrillics.png
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:35 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
--- Comment #42 from Fedora End Of Life <jkurik(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 24 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 2 (two) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 24. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version'
of '24'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 24 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:43 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Fedora End Of Life <jkurik(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |EOL
Last Closed|2016-07-19 06:24:39 |2017-08-08 07:43:21
--- Comment #43 from Fedora End Of Life <jkurik(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
Fedora 24 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-08-08. Fedora 24 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:25 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Version|24 |rawhide
Resolution|EOL |---
--- Comment #44 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> ---
This is still not fixed. I am moving to Rawhide now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:18 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Satyabrata Maitra <smaitra(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |i18n
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:21 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
sachin <spathare(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |spathare(a)redhat.com
Version|27 |28
--- Comment #46 from sachin <spathare(a)redhat.com> ---
Reproducible in F28
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:15 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1009650] Some Serbian glyphs seem to be Latin glyph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|psatpute(a)redhat.com |vvijayra(a)redhat.com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2068
days inactive
3873
days old
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org
48 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com -
Red Hat Bugzilla