Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2008-10-29 13:34:34 EDT --- We've merged a lot of Asian (Korean...) fonts lately, maybe it's one of them
You really need to have Behdad audit the fontconfig priority level given to all recent CJK fonts (and I include fonts in the pipeline like hanazono).
For example, I've seen CJK packages that proposed 59 as priority, when our guidelines (which match upstream's) state the highest priority for a non LGC font should be 65.
I hope we'll not repeat the arms race between Chinese/Japanese/Korean users where each one tries to one-up the other and put himself higher in the priority queue.
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org