https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
Bug ID: 1203718 Summary: CVE-2015-1803 libXfont: crash on invalid read in bdfReadCharacters Product: Security Response Component: vulnerability Keywords: Security Severity: low Priority: low Assignee: security-response-team@redhat.com Reporter: mprpic@redhat.com CC: btissoir@redhat.com, fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, sandmann@redhat.com
If the bdf parser failed to parse the data for the bitmap for any character, it would proceed with an invalid pointer to the bitmap data and later crash when trying to read the bitmap from that pointer.
A local user could exploit this issue to crash the X.Org server.
Upstream advisory:
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2015/q1/865
Upstream patch:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libXfont/commit/?id=78c2e3d70d29698244f...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
Martin Prpic mprpic@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1203720
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203720 [Bug 1203720] CVE-2015-1802 libXfont: missing range check in bdfReadProperties [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
--- Comment #1 from Martin Prpic mprpic@redhat.com ---
Created libXfont tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1203720]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
Martin Prpic mprpic@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1203722
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718 Bug 1203718 depends on bug 1203720, which changed state.
Bug 1203720 Summary: CVE-2015-1804 CVE-2015-1802 CVE-2015-1803 libXfont: various flaws [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203720
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- libXfont-1.5.1-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
Taylor Frazier tfrazier@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tfrazier@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
--- Doc Text *updated* by Stefan Cornelius scorneli@redhat.com --- A NULL pointer dereference flaw was discovered in the way libXfont processed certain Glyph Bitmap Distribution Format (BDF) fonts. A malicious, local user could exploit this issue to crash the X.Org server.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
Stefan Cornelius scorneli@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard|impact=low,public=20150317, |impact=low,public=20150317, |reported=20150318,source=in |reported=20150318,source=in |ternet,cvss2=1.9/AV:L/AC:M/ |ternet,cvss2=1.9/AV:L/AC:M/ |Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P,rhel-5/lib |Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P,rhel-5/lib |Xfont=affected,rhel-6/libXf |Xfont=affected,rhel-6/libXf |ont=affected,rhel-7/libXfon |ont=affected,rhel-7/libXfon |t=affected,fedora-all/libXf |t=affected,fedora-all/libXf |ont=affected |ont=affected,cwe=CWE-252->C | |WE-391->CWE-476
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
--- Doc Text *updated* by Martin Prpic mprpic@redhat.com --- A NULL pointer dereference flaw was discovered in the way libXfont processed certain Glyph Bitmap Distribution Format (BDF) fonts. A malicious, local user could use this flaw to crash the X.Org server.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
Stefan Cornelius scorneli@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1258892
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
Stefan Cornelius scorneli@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1258893
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
Stefan Cornelius scorneli@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1258894
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
Stefan Cornelius scorneli@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1258895
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
--- Comment #4 from errata-xmlrpc errata-xmlrpc@redhat.com --- This issue has been addressed in the following products:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Via RHSA-2015:1708 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1708.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
ddu@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ddu@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from ddu@redhat.com --- Hi guys,
Does this problem CVE affect libXfont shipped with RHEL5?
Best regards, Dapeng
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
Matt Goldman magoldma@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |magoldma@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Matt Goldman magoldma@redhat.com --- Dapeng,
Yes, from the whiteboard RHEL 5 is affected:
rhel-5/libXfont=affected
However, RHEL 5 has entered Production Phase 3 as of January 31, 2014. As per our errata policy:
"During the Production 3 Phase, Critical impact Security Advisories (RHSAs) and selected Urgent Priority Bug Fix Advisories (RHBAs) may be released as they become available." Red Hat Enterprise Linux Life Cycle https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata#Production_3_Phase
This means that Red Hat will not be addressing Low, Moderate, or Important impact CVE's in relation to RHEL 5.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
--- Comment #7 from ddu@redhat.com --- Hi Matt,
Thank you for your comment.
So there is some possibility that this problem will be fixed in rhel5, right?
But we can not guarantee that.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203718
--- Comment #8 from Matt Goldman magoldma@redhat.com --- Dapeng,
Correct. Likely, this will not be fixed in RHEL 5.
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org