Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532818
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |ozamosi(a)flukkost.nu
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2009-11-06
17:19:02 EDT ---
Review:
1. I'd say this is a serif font but probably does not matter much for a symbol
font
2. Needs fontconfig prio < 65, nothing really exotic in there
3. repo-font audit suggests extending it to cover more scripts
But his is all minor
⅏⅏⅏ APPROVED ⅏⅏⅏
Nice to see Unicode 5.2 fonts are already appearing
You can now continue from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a
I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a
other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our
organisation or documentation on the fonts mailing list.
Thank you for another contribution to our font package pool.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.