https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414319
Bug ID: 1414319 Summary: freetype ftoption.h evaluates undefined macros Product: Fedora Version: 25 Component: freetype Severity: low Assignee: mkasik@redhat.com Reporter: yeti@physics.muni.cz QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: behdad@fedoraproject.org, fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin@tigcc.ticalc.org, mkasik@redhat.com
Description of problem: Header file /usr/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftoption.h evaluates the numerical value of undefined macro TT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_HINTING. This is somewhat annoying with -Wundef (and a poor practice).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): freetype-2.6.5-1.fc25
How reproducible: Always.
Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create file bug.c with the following contents:
#include <ft2build.h> #include FT_FREETYPE_H
2. Run (with freetype-devel installed)
gcc -Wundef -c $(pkg-config --cflags freetype2) bug.c
Actual results:
In file included from /usr/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftconfig-64.h:42:0, from /usr/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftconfig.h:9, from /usr/include/freetype2/freetype/freetype.h:33, from bug.c:2: /usr/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftoption.h:845:5: warning: "TT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_HINTING" is not defined [-Wundef] #if TT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_HINTING & 1 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/freetype2/freetype/config/ftoption.h:849:5: warning: "TT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_HINTING" is not defined [-Wundef] #if TT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_HINTING & 2 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Expected results: It compiles cleanly.
Additional info: The numerical evaluation should be guarded by an #ifdef -- AFAICT the expected behaviour when TT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_HINTING is undefined is that neither TT_SUPPORT_SUBPIXEL_HINTING_INFINALITY nor TT_SUPPORT_SUBPIXEL_HINTING_MINIMAL should be defined:
--- ftoption.h.orig 2017-01-18 10:41:32.517812687 +0100 +++ ftoption.h 2017-01-18 10:42:16.852136325 +0100 @@ -842,6 +842,7 @@ #ifdef TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER #define TT_USE_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER
+#ifdef TT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_HINTING #if TT_CONFIG_OPTION_SUBPIXEL_HINTING & 1 #define TT_SUPPORT_SUBPIXEL_HINTING_INFINALITY #endif @@ -850,6 +851,7 @@ #define TT_SUPPORT_SUBPIXEL_HINTING_MINIMAL #endif #endif +#endif
/*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414319
--- Comment #1 from Fedora End Of Life jkurik@fedoraproject.org --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 25 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 25. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '25'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 25 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414319
Fedora End Of Life jkurik@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed| |2017-12-12 05:52:25
--- Comment #2 from Fedora End Of Life jkurik@fedoraproject.org --- Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org