Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564466
--- Comment #3 from Paul Flo Williams <paul(a)frixxon.co.uk> 2010-02-19 11:33:15 EST
---
(In reply to comment #2)
I forgot to question this one. OFL v1.1 isn't on the list of
valid licences, so
I omitted the version when I guess I should have asked upstream about this.
it appears that OFL v1.1 has the short
name "OFL", so the spec is correct.
If you're asking about the "OFL and GPL" versus "OFL or GPL",
then
Packaging:LicensingGuidelines says that this one is "or", as the font is dual
licensed.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.