On 3 October 2013 16:34, Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 17:15 +0530, pravin.d.s@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently i done packaging of google-noto-fonts [1] for Fedora. With this font we got number of new script fonts of Unicode which were not available earlier. [2]
Sorry to pick old emails, I have a devel@ backlog currently.
Just a plea to please be very conservative introducing new packages (and hence extra size) to the default set, as both the DVD and desktop live images are currently (Alpha, and Beta TC1) oversize and need trimming. I think we should aim to have sufficient font coverage for all practical out-of-the-box Fedora usage, but try and do so as efficiently as possible, at least as long as we're sticking to current image size targets. Thanks!
Yes, do agree with.
<packagereq type="default">google-noto-sans-lisu-fonts</packagereq> -> 12K <packagereq type="default">google-noto-sans-mandaic-fonts</packagereq> -> 20K <packagereq type="default">google-noto-sans-meeteimayek-fonts</packagereq> -> 20K <packagereq type="default">google-noto-sans-tagalog-fonts</packagereq> -> 16K <packagereq type="default">google-noto-sans-tai-tham-fonts</packagereq> -> 36K <packagereq type="default">google-noto-sans-tai-viet-fonts</packagereq> -> 20K
Above are the packages added to default install list of Fedora from google-noto-fonts, i believe these are important and we don't have substitute for them in existing default fonts list packages.
Regards, Pravin Satpute