On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 09:01:47AM -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:25:18 -0500
> James Antill <james(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> ...so this seems it's all up in the air, right? Is there any reason we
>> can't/shouldn't wait for next week, given that it isn't approved?
>
> Well, looking at it sooner rather than later might be nice for the
> feature owners. I asked them to not do anything until things are all
> set for scope.
>
>> > notting voted on the fesco ticket in such a way that it's unclear
>> > whether he was +1 or -1 to the feature as written.
>>
>> Would it pass with +5/-4 ?
>
> Yes. FESCo uses simple majority.
>
>> > If notting can reply before the FPC meeting, I've asked nirik to
>> > open up an FPC ticket for whether we'll reject that as written as
>> > we did in the preliminary look.
>> >
>> >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
>>
>> Also ... if FESCO passes it as-is ... what would we reject? Just the
>> sbin changes? Can we do that?
>
> I'd rather avoid the 'who can override who' discussion. ;)
>
> Speaking for myself (a member of fesco) but not fesco, I would really
> like to hear from FPC those parts that they feel are not in Fedora's
> best interests. FESCo empowered the FPC to handle those issues, so
> IMHO, we should let FPC review and let us know what parts we should
> drop from the scope or re-work.
>
> I would hope that FESCo would see those concerns and ask the feature
> owners to adjust their feature to match.
I may or may not make the meeting due to $_DAYJOB.
Looks like the last vote for the fesco ticket has not happened. So we don't
have a large outstanding ticket to take care of.
-Toshio