devel August 2008

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

290 participants
297 discussions

is this me or koji?
by victor 22 Aug '08

22 Aug '08

Ok; I can submit builds, but this failed for me and I don't know why, here's the log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=778765&name=build.log ====================== ENTER do(['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/olpcsound.spec'], False, '/var/lib/mock/dist-olpc3-build-240327-43916/root/', None, 0, True, 0, 101, 102, None, logger=<mock.trace_decorator.getLog object at 0x2b25e6985f50>) Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/olpcsound.spec'] /etc/profile: line 38: /bin/hostname: No such file or directory sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: x86-7.fedora.phx.redhat.com Building target platforms: i386 Building for target i386 Wrote: /builddir/build/SRPMS/olpcsound-5.08.92-9.olpc3.src.rpm LEAVE do --> ======================== No python? Any suggestions very welcome. Victor

3 3

upcoming varnish-2.0, or running a test suite that starts and connects to a daemon
by Ingvar Hagelund 22 Aug '08

22 Aug '08

varnish is a high performance http accellerator. http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/ This is a posting about packaging varnish-2.0-prebeta-something. It is also a posting about strange behaviour in rpmbuild. It has been a while since varnish-1.1.x was submitted to Fedora, and a lot of people have asked for newer versions. Now, 2.0 is only a few days (read weeks) from release, and tech previews and betas are more or less available. So, I have started touching up the specfile for a Fedora release. I will probably submit the first public beta to rawhide, and perhaps push it for EPEL, and follow upstream till and through 2.0. In the following, the source used is a tarball from a svn checkout from trunk, generated for example like this: svn co http://varnish.projects.linpro.no/svn/trunk/varnish-cache tar cvzf varnish-cache.tar.gz varnish-cache The specfile used is based on the one used in Fedora for 1.1.x. It can be downloaded here: http://init.linpro.no/ingvar/varnish/varnish.spec Per default, it builds a working pre-alpha version of varnish 2.0. varnish-2.0 has a test suite. It is ran by 'make check'. The test suite runs a series of tests that checks if the build works as expected. Most of the tests starts a server at port 9080 and 9081, and runs some tests against the ports, parsing the output. Now, running 'make check' from a interactive shell on a Fedora 9 system works more or less as it should. It fails on one of the 72 tests on my intel/i386 box, and passes all the testes on my AMD based box. That is food for the upstream guys. But when I run the test suite from within rpmbuild, most of the tests fails or hangs every time, and the problem seems to be related to some missing communication between the test scripts and the test server process. The problem is not related to selinux. Is it possible at all to run this kind of tests from within rpmbuild? If so, I would be grateful if someone gave advice and/or had a look at the problem. The make check command is ready for decommenting in the specfile. Ingvar

3 6

Is the a package like Debian/Ubuntu's equivs for RPM?
by Vasile Gaburici 21 Aug '08

21 Aug '08

It allows one to pretend some files were installed by the (system) package manager when they really were not.

3 3

CVS still down?
by Peter Lemenkov 21 Aug '08

21 Aug '08

Hello All! Subj: [petro@Sulaco flashrom]$ cvs -t up -> main loop with CVSROOT=:ext:peter@cvs.fedora.redhat.com:/cvs/extras -> Starting server: ssh -l peter cvs.fedora.redhat.com cvs server Permission denied (publickey). cvs [update aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) -> Lock_Cleanup() [petro@Sulaco flashrom]$ -- With best regards!

3 2

Warning: Email bounces from Saturday August 16th until Tuesday August 19th 2008
by Seth Vidal 21 Aug '08

21 Aug '08

Brief explanation: For a number of addresses @fedoraproject.org there were windows when those email addresses would have bounced reporting that the address did not exist. This happened as a result of the re-installation of the mail forwarding server. Please check all mailing list subscriptions to make sure you have not been inadvertently unsubscribed or disabled due to this error. Gory Details: During it's re-installation the postfix mail server was installed but it was not configured in the alternatives system so that its /usr/bin/newaliases command was the one being run. As a result sendmail's newaliases command was being run and it was changing the permissions of the aliases file such that postfix could not read it. It did not get noticed until Tuesday due to other issues taking precedence. The alias-generation would run once every 30 minutes. Breaking the aliases. Then our configuration management system would run on a slightly out-of-pace schedule with the aliases and correct the permissions. This problem has been corrected, sorry for the inconvenience. -sv -- I only speak for me. Friends don't let Friends use Sendmail _______________________________________________ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list Fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce

1 0

FAS vs new email
by Mike Chambers 21 Aug '08

21 Aug '08

I don't think I ever changed my email on my FAS account and have since got a new one (happned month or two ago I guess). I can't login now obviously due to the infastructure scenario and the password reset, which my email is needed for the password reset. Can someone change my email for me, or my password so I can change it? Sorry if wrong place, wasn't sure where to go to ask for help. -- Mike Chambers Fedora Project - Ambassador, Bug Zapper, Tester, User, etc.. mikec302(a)fedoraproject.org

2 2

Zabbix 1.5.4 RPMs
by Jeffrey Ollie 21 Aug '08

21 Aug '08

I've built some RPMs for Zabbix 1.5.4. The major changes: * There's a new component - the proxy. * Server and proxy binaries are built for all three databases that Zabbix supports (MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite3). You choose between databases by installing the appropriate subpackage. Unless you force and install it shouldn't be possible to install more than one at a time. * The 'zabbix' RPM does not contain the server, instead it contains bits that are common to all of the packages. * There should be conflicts and obsoletes that are set to get everything working on a upgrade, but that's not tested. * The cpustats patch has been disabled (but it's included in the SRPM) because it causes the agent to segfault. I had to resolve some conflicts to get it to apply cleanly to 1.5.4 and I must have messed something up. RPMs and SRPMs can be found here for EL-5 and development: http://repo.ocjtech.us/zabbix/ A git repo with my work on the cpustats branch can be found in the cpustats branch: git://fedorapeople.org/~jcollie/zabbix.git We're looking at using Zabbix 1.6 in Fedora Infrastructure so these packages will get some thrashing but the more people that look it over the better. Hopefully some smart person out there will figure out what I've done to the cpustats patch and get it fixed up. Jeff

3 2

Package Review SIG
by Jason L Tibbitts III 21 Aug '08

21 Aug '08

I would like to begin organizing a SIG for package reviews and the issues surrounding them. I spent a couple of minutes to create https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Package_Review and put in a couple of tidbits. Everyone is welcome; interested parties should respond here or, if you wish, privately to me. Organization is not a particularly strong suit of mine, so I particularly welcome anyone who is willing to step up and help me get this thing rolling. - J<

6 9

ssh host keys changed?
by Gerd Hoffmann 21 Aug '08

21 Aug '08

Hi folks, zweiblum kraxel ~# ssh fedorapeople.org @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ WARNING: REMOTE HOST IDENTIFICATION HAS CHANGED! @ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ IT IS POSSIBLE THAT SOMEONE IS DOING SOMETHING NASTY! Someone could be eavesdropping on you right now (man-in-the-middle attack)! It is also possible that the RSA host key has just been changed. The fingerprint for the RSA key sent by the remote host is 07:d4:02:db:9f:70:d5:2d:7f:1b:6a:df:83:73:95:1d. Please contact your system administrator. For Fedora Hosted a new ssh fingerprint was announced two days ago. Not so for Fedora People though. Any info on this one? Should I be worried? cheers, Gerd

3 2

what is gencert?
by victor 21 Aug '08

21 Aug '08

I have logged into my fedora account to see if I can send my key again and it asked me to download gencert, which I did? Now what should I do with it? Victor Lazzarini Music Technology Laboratory Music Department National University of Ireland, Maynooth

2 2

← Newer
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
30
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel August 2008