August 2017 - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Martin Gansser

$ fedpkg clone nuvola-app-mixcloud; cd nuvola-app-mixcloud $ fedpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/nuvola-app-mixcloud-3.2-3.fc26.src.rpm $ git commit -m "Initial import (#1478067)." $[martin@f26 nuvola-app-mixcloud]$ git push -v Pushing to ssh://martinkg@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-mixcloud FATAL: W any rpms/nuvola-app-mixcloud martinkg DENIED by fallthru (or you mis-spelled the reponame) fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists.

21 minutes

9
18
0 / 0

Fedora Elections to FESCo & FAmSCo - Voting period is in progress

by Jan Kurik

Hi, let me remind you we have Voting period of the currently running Fedora Elections into FESCo and FAmSCo in progress. Please vote for your candidates to FAmSCo [1] and FESCo [2]. The Voting period ends on August 21th, 2017 at 23:59:59 UTC. You might also check an article, summarizing interviews with nominees [3]. [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/vote/famsco-august-2017-2nd.round [2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/vote/fesco-august-2017-2nd.round [3] https://fedoramagazine.org/august-2017-elections/ Thanks for your support. Regards, Jan -- Jan Kuřík Platform & Fedora Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic

2 hours, 20 minutes

2
1
0 / 0

How to request new branch?

by Jaroslav Skarvada

According to the fedrepo doc linked from [1] I did: $ fedrepo-req-branch preeny f26 And the ticket [2] was closed with a message: "The branch in PDC was created. You may now create the branch in Pagure using git." I did: $ git checkout -b f26 Switched to a new branch 'f26' $ git push -u origin f26 Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: FATAL: C refs/heads/f26 rpms/preeny jskarvad DENIED by refs/heads/f[0-9][0-9] remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/f26 To ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/preeny ! [remote rejected] f26 -> f26 (hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://jskarvad@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/preeny' Am I missing something? thanks & regards Jaroslav [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/WhatHappenedToPkgdb#How_do_... [2] https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33

5 hours, 24 minutes

4
8
0 / 0

0Day policy update

by Jan Kurik

Hi, as discussed in thread [1] I would like to propose update of the blocker process SOP page [2] regarding Accepted0Day and AcceptedPreviousRelease. Currently we have in the policy the following statement: "Accepted0Day is used for cases where the fix does not need to appear in the final frozen release, but must be available as an update on release day. AcceptedPreviousRelease is used for cases where the fix must appear as an update for one or more stable releases." This statement does not fully define timing of Accepted0Day and AcceptedPreviousRelease with regard to release date. During F26 release cycle we were on Go/No-Go meetings discussing whether we need to block release on a bug or whether we can release it as 0day. The main concern was timing of 0day bugs where we did not have guaranteed that a fix for the 0day bug will be available on time for the release day. Having this experience I would like to propose update of the blocker process SOP page [2], defining also more specific timing of 0day bugs. My proposal looks as follow: "Accepted0Day is used for cases where the fix does not need to appear in the final frozen release, but must be available as an update on release day. AcceptedPreviousRelease is used for cases where the fix must appear as an update for one or more stable releases. If an Accepted0Day or an AcceptedPreviousRelease might possibly block a release it must be also verified at the time of Go/No-Go meeting for the related release day, otherwise it is considered as a blocker." Does anyone has any objection or concern to update the SOP as proposed ? [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.or... [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process Regards, Jan -- Jan Kuřík Platform & Fedora Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic

5 hours, 27 minutes

1
0
0 / 0

Arduino in Fedora

by Tom Callaway

In attempting to figure out why the lulzbot-marlin-firmware was not being compiled properly, I noticed that the arduino packages in Fedora were a bit out of date. To remedy this, I made updated versions of them and put them in my copr here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/spot/arduino-1.8/ Testing of these packages would be greatly appreciated. I have also submitted arduino-listSerialPortsC for review, it is a new architecture specific dependency: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482095 This one is a very small package, will be a nice easy review for someone. To be clear: I am not necessarily blaming my firmware issues on the older arduino packages, I just thought it would be helpful to bring the stack up to the current revisions. Thanks, ~tom

5 hours, 58 minutes

4
4
0 / 0

tcp_wrappers deprecation

by Jakub Jelen

Hello Fedora devels and users, more than three years ago, the same topic started discussion if we want this package in Fedora or not and how [1]. The discussion resulted mostly in flames and in the removal of the dependency on tcp_wrappers from systemd. But it was quite agreed that it is considered as a security layer for some users, if they use it correctly, or something that is or should be replaced by firewalls. So can we discuss it now once more without the affiliation to systemd? The fact is that we still do not have any other replacement except firewalls. But do we need one? The complete removal of the package is probably not a wise step, even though we can not find tcp_wrappers in recent SuSE anymore [2]. It is still available in Arch [3] without other tools depending on it. To be fair, Debian [4] is still building tools (for example openssh) with a build-time support for it. My primary concern is OpenSSH, which upstream dropped support for tcp_wrappers three years ago (late 2014) [5] and since then we are maintaining one more downstream patch. But this effort should be coordinated among other components to simplify the transition for users who insist on using it (using tcpd). Removing the dependency will also allow us to trim the default install for few more Kb. If there will be no significant drawbacks, I will progress with filling a system wide change for Fedora 28 and I will pull the maintainers of other tolls using libwrap into the round and discussion. [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/196913.h tml [2] https://www.rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=tcpd&submit =Search+...&system=&arch= [3] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/tcp-wrappers/ [4] https://packages.debian.org/sid/openssh-server [5] http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-6.7 Thank you for comments and constructive ideas. Regards, -- Jakub Jelen Software Engineer Security Technologies Red Hat, Inc.

6 hours, 4 minutes

4
4
0 / 0

g2clib static lib file name change

by Jos de Kloe

Hi, I just build a new version of g2clib (upgraded from 1.4.0 to 1.6.0), and with this change this static library for grib file handling changes name: old: libgrib2c.a new: libg2c_v1.6.0.a I dont know of a packaging guideline that tells me to announce this, but to prevent surprises for dependent packages I thought I'd mention it. Best regards, Jos

7 hours, 52 minutes

2
2
0 / 0

Re: Is it possible atlas is linked wrongly by new binutils?

by Richard W.M. Jones

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:21:30AM +0200, Jakub Martisko wrote: > > > On 9.8.2017 11:37, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > ocaml-gsl (OCaml bindings for GNU Scientific Library) currently > > fails to link to atlas: > > > > + /usr/bin/ocamlfind ocamlopt -g -I lib -linkpkg -package bigarray -I lib -I examples lib/gsl.cmxa examples/blas_ex.cmx -o examples/blas_ex.native > > /usr/lib64/atlas/libsatlas.so: undefined reference to `dlarfy_' > > /usr/lib64/atlas/libsatlas.so: undefined reference to `slarfy_' > > /usr/lib64/atlas/libsatlas.so: undefined reference to `clarfy_' > > /usr/lib64/atlas/libsatlas.so: undefined reference to `zlarfy_' > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > However this only happens with the very latest atlas that was built by > > binutils 2.29 (atlas-3.10.2-18.fc27.x86_64). It doesn't occur with > > the previous version of atlas (atlas-3.10.2-16.fc26) even though there > > seems to have been no change in atlas. > > > > $ nm -D /usr/lib64/atlas/libtatlas.so | grep larfy > > U clarfy_ > > U dlarfy_ > > U slarfy_ > > U zlarfy_ > > > > I looked in /usr/lib64 on my development machine which has atlas > > installed but there is no .so* file that I can find which defines > > these symbols. I also couldn't work out where in the atlas code > > (which is a bit strange) these references are used. > > > > Hence the question: Is this breakage in atlas? binutils? > > > > Rich. > > > > OK so it seems that according to git commit messages LAPACK > has been rebased from 3.6.0 to 3.7.1 day before that mass > rebuild [1][2]. Those "larfy" subroutines have been added to > LAPACK in 3.7.0 and have not been present before[3]. I've > tried to make a scratch build of atlas [4] and the missing > symbols seem to be present... > > $ nm -D ./libtatlas.so.3|grep larfy > > T clarfy_ > T dlarfy_ > T slarfy_ > T zlarfy_ It looks as if you scratch build just changes ‘rm’ to ‘rm -f’ at one point in the spec file. Is that change also needed? I can do a bump and rebuild of atlas with or without that change - let me know. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top

8 hours, 1 minute

8
21
0 / 0

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2017-08-17 16:00 UTC)

by James Antill

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2017-08-17 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): ================= Day: Thursday ================== 2017-08-17 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2017-08-17 12:00 EDT --> US/Eastern <-- 2017-08-17 16:00 UTC UTC 2017-08-17 17:00 BST Europe/London 2017-08-17 18:00 CEST Europe/Berlin 2017-08-17 18:00 CEST Europe/Paris 2017-08-17 21:30 IST Asia/Calcutta ---------------- New Day: Friday ----------------- 2017-08-18 00:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong 2017-08-18 00:00 +08 Asia/Singapore 2017-08-18 01:00 JST Asia/Tokyo 2017-08-18 02:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting = Followups = #topic #654 glibc file triggers .fpc 654 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/654 #topic #691 noarch *sub*packages with arch-specific dependencies .fpc 691 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/691 #topic #693 Wiki:Packaging:RPMMacros .fpc 693 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/693 #topic #696 Packages not following the Guidelines for bundled libraries .fpc 696 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/696 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://pagure.io/packaging-committee, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

10 hours, 41 minutes

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora Rawhide-20170815.n.1 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

Missing expected images: Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 34/137 (x86_64), 17/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170814.n.0): ID: 130199 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130199 ID: 130201 Test: i386 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130201 ID: 130202 Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130202 ID: 130203 Test: i386 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130203 ID: 130204 Test: i386 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130204 ID: 130205 Test: i386 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130205 ID: 130206 Test: i386 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130206 ID: 130207 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130207 ID: 130208 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130208 ID: 130209 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130209 ID: 130210 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130210 ID: 130211 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130211 ID: 130212 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130212 ID: 130328 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130328 ID: 130342 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130342 Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20170814.n.0): ID: 130114 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130114 ID: 130116 Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130116 ID: 130118 Test: x86_64 Workstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130118 ID: 130119 Test: x86_64 Workstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130119 ID: 130120 Test: x86_64 Workstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130120 ID: 130142 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130142 ID: 130143 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130143 ID: 130144 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130144 ID: 130145 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130145 ID: 130146 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130146 ID: 130150 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130150 ID: 130151 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130151 ID: 130152 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130152 ID: 130192 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130192 ID: 130197 Test: x86_64 universal install_rescue_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130197 ID: 130198 Test: x86_64 universal install_rescue_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130198 ID: 130213 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130213 ID: 130214 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130214 ID: 130215 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130215 ID: 130338 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130338 ID: 130339 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130339 ID: 130340 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130340 ID: 130341 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_system_logging URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130341 ID: 130343 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130343 ID: 130346 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130346 ID: 130347 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130347 ID: 130348 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130348 ID: 130349 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130349 ID: 130350 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130350 ID: 130360 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130360 ID: 130361 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130361 ID: 130536 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130536 ID: 130538 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130538 ID: 130539 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130539 ID: 130540 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130540 ID: 130544 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130544 ID: 130545 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130545 Soft failed openQA tests: 60/137 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test did not soft fail in Rawhide-20170814.n.0): ID: 130128 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130128 ID: 130148 Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130148 ID: 130149 Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ntfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130149 ID: 130154 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130154 ID: 130167 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130167 ID: 130176 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130176 ID: 130190 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130190 ID: 130194 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130194 ID: 130195 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130195 ID: 130551 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130551 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Rawhide-20170814.n.0): ID: 130059 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130059 ID: 130060 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130060 ID: 130061 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130061 ID: 130062 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130062 ID: 130070 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130070 ID: 130071 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130071 ID: 130080 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130080 ID: 130082 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130082 ID: 130083 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130083 ID: 130102 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130102 ID: 130117 Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130117 ID: 130127 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130127 ID: 130130 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130130 ID: 130131 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130131 ID: 130132 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130132 ID: 130133 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130133 ID: 130147 Test: x86_64 universal install_updates_img_local URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130147 ID: 130158 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130158 ID: 130159 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130159 ID: 130160 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130160 ID: 130161 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130161 ID: 130163 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130163 ID: 130165 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130165 ID: 130166 Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130166 ID: 130172 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130172 ID: 130173 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130173 ID: 130174 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130174 ID: 130175 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130175 ID: 130177 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130177 ID: 130178 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130178 ID: 130180 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130180 ID: 130181 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130181 ID: 130183 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130183 ID: 130184 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130184 ID: 130185 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130185 ID: 130186 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130186 ID: 130188 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130188 ID: 130189 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130189 ID: 130191 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130191 ID: 130193 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130193 ID: 130200 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130200 ID: 130542 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_hdd URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130542 ID: 130546 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130546 ID: 130549 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130549 ID: 130550 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130550 ID: 130555 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130555 ID: 130556 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130556 ID: 130557 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130557 ID: 130585 Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130585 ID: 130586 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130586 ID: 130588 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130588 Passed openQA tests: 11/137 (x86_64) New passes (same test did not pass in Rawhide-20170814.n.0): ID: 130065 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_firewall_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130065 ID: 130066 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130066 ID: 130067 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130067 ID: 130129 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130129 ID: 130182 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130182 ID: 130587 Test: x86_64 universal support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130587 Skipped openQA tests: 27 of 157 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.33 to 0.13 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/129332#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130060#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: 578 packages(s) added since previous compose: GeoIP, GeoIP-GeoLite-data, ModemManager, ModemManager-glib, NetworkManager, NetworkManager-bluetooth, NetworkManager-libnm, NetworkManager-team, NetworkManager-wifi, NetworkManager-wwan... Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/129333#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130061#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: 3 packages(s) added since previous compose: cockpit-packagekit, sscg, sssd-kcm Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/129334#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130062#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 1 packages(s) added since previous compose: sssd-kcm Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/129355#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130083#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal: 1 packages(s) added since previous compose: sssd-kcm Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/129427#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/130555#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

16 hours, 8 minutes

1
0
0 / 0

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel August 2017