upgrading RH 9 system->Fedora with iso files and apt only
by Didier Casse
I have the yarrow's iso files on my HD in a RH9 system. Let's say I want
to upgrade selected packages using an "apt-get install" pointing to my
iso-mounted files, how do I do it?
i.e I mount the iso into some /mnt/yarrow1, /mnt/yarrow 2 etc..
Then what is the complete procedure to make my apt look into my own HD to
upgrade packages. Can anybody redirect me to the correct
resource or some literature hanging on the web? Thanks.
Assume also that I do not wish to burn CDs! I do not want to use
apt-cdrom. Thanks.
With kind regards,
Didier.
---
PhD student
Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS)
5 Research Link,
Singapore 117603
Email: slsbdfc at nus dot edu dot sg \or\
didierbe at sps dot nus dot edu dot sg
Website: http://ssls.nus.edu.sg
1 year, 8 months
pdftk retired?
by Michael J Gruber
I just git a "broken dependencies" notice for a package that I maintain.
The reason is that "pdftk" got retired just the other day.
I may have missed a corresponding post on fedora-devel, but I think a
heads up notice to maintainers of depending packages may be in order
before you retire a package, as a general idea.
You see, unretiring a package is so much more work than changing
maintainership.
As for pdftk: I see 2 failed builds for version 1.45 and none for the
current version 2.02 (which probably breaks the api anyways). What are
the plans? Retire pdftk completely? Start fresh with pdftk2?
pdflabs, the maker of pdftk, provide binary as well as source rpms for
pdftk 2.02, by the way. I might even look into packaging it but don't
want to duplicate any existing efforts.
Michael
2 years
apitrace, bundled libbacktrace
by Sandro Mani
Hi,
apitrace 5.0 bundles libbacktrace, which looks like is living within the
gcc sources. libbacktrace is not build as a shared library from the gcc
sources, and not packaged.
Is it feasible to build libbacktrace as a shared library and ship it in
a corresponding package? Or should I rather go for a bundling exception
request?
Thanks,
Sandro
5 years, 9 months
F21 Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos
by Jaroslav Reznik
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bareos
Change Owner(s): Simone Caronni <negativo17 at gmail.com>
The powerful Bacula network backup solution has switched from being Open
Source friendly to being almost closed source. Originally the project was
conceived totally as Open Source, but since the creation of Bacula Systems and
its proprietary Bacula Enterprise Edition product, the Open Source (now called
"Community Edition") has received less and less updates and is mostly
abandoned.
== Detailed description ==
The most important points that are left "abandoned" are the following:
* Installation scripts and updates to makefiles are not updated anymore.
* New plugins and functionalities are not added anymore, except those in the
"core" daemons.
* Gaphical (and buggy) console has not received any update in almost two
years.
* Patches and bugs opened in the bug tracker are mostly left abandoned. Even
trivial fixes are not imported in the source.
* Windows binaries are no longer provided, nor the source for the clients has
been updated. Even if compiled with difficulties, there is no support for recent
Windows versions.
A former Bacula developer, frustrated by the situation created the fork Bareos
a long time ago from Bacula 5.2.x (the current Fedora and RHEL 7 version).
This version has now received '''a lot of bugfixes''' compared to the original
Bacula source. This makes compilation and installation a lot easier than it
was with Bacula.
On top of this, a '''lot of new features''' have been added; some unique to
Bareos but many available only in the closed source Bacula Enterprise.
Here is the list of new features compared to the current Bacula 5.2.13:
* http://www.bareos.org/en/whats_new.html
Some highlights include NDMP support for enterprise class storage (NetApp,
etc.), support for enterprise class tape libraries and Windows support
(including Windows Server 2012) with Bareos generated binaries.
For further details on why a Bacula fork was created please look at the
following links:
* http://www.bareos.org/en/faq/items/why_fork.html
Bareos can also be '''fully compatible with Bacula''' by setting a specific
configuration directive in the Daemon configuration files; thus providing the
option for RHEL 6/7 users to interoperate with Fedora systems.
* http://www.bareos.org/en/faq/items/bareos_bacula_compatibility.html
== Scope ==
To accomplish the goal, the following Bacula packages need to be replaced with
Bareos equivalents:
bacula
bacula-docs
Currently, the same Fedora packages can be rebuilt as they are, to work also
on CentOS/RHEL 5 and 6, upgrading the EPEL or official Bacula packages in the
distributions. This is to have a consistent backup infrastructure across all
the Fedora/CentOS/RHEL ecosystem.
To ease installation, a repository for installing those packages on a
CentOS/RHEL system do exist:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/README.txt
The idea is the same for Bareos: import into Fedora 21 packages that can be
rebuilt for all supported Fedora/RHEL/CentOS releases and provide a repository
that can upgrade any Bacula release currently installed in the system with the
new one. In detail; the upgrade scenarios supported when going from Bacula to
Bareos would be:
From Bacula 2.4:
* RHEL/CentOS 5 with EPEL repository
From Bacula 5.0:
* RHEL/CentOS 6
From Bacula 5.2.13:
* Fedora 18+
* RHEL/CentOS 5
* RHEL/CentOS 6
As written before, the change is impacting only Fedora 21, the list of
upgrades supported are only for users who want a consistent backup solution
across the enterprise.
=== External activities ===
Proposal owners: I'm the current Bacula mantainer in Fedora and will complete
the transition in time for the release.
Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
Release engineering: the release engineering team should make sure the new
Bareos packages are in place instead of the current Bacula packages for the
new release.
Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
_______________________________________________
devel-announce mailing list
devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
8 years, 5 months
Configurable version of suexec in Debian but not Fedora?!
by Neal Gompa
So a friend of mine has been wrangling with suexec trying to configure it
for his needs, and he has become quite furious over the fact that suexec
isn't configurable.
Then he finds out that Debian actually has a version of suexec[1] that lets
you use a conf file to configure suexec. My question is, why the heck isn't
this in Fedora? How is it that Debian can offer both versions[1][2], but
Fedora cannot?
I'm honestly surprised that Fedora doesn't offer this little piece of
flexibility. I would think that this would be in Fedora and RHEL, because
of how useful this would be. So what's going on here?
[1]: https://packages.debian.org/sid/apache2-suexec-custom
[2]: https://packages.debian.org/sid/apache2-suexec-pristine
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
8 years, 7 months
PkgDB, pending ACL requests
by Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good Morning everyone!
In the version 1.13 of pkgdb2 a new API endpoint has been added that just
provide the list of pending ACL requests:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/api/pendingacls
I just wanted to share with you the first line of its output:
# Number of requests pending: 5492
Now I do realize that the branching that occured yesterday is blowing up this
number compared to yesterday, but please be careful to log in pkgdb2 once a
while and check out the pending ACL requests requiring your attention.
Note: Since the same pkgdb2 release, there is a small notification showing-up
and informing you about any pending ACL requests requiring your attention every
time you log in the application :)
Pierre
9 years
Future Packager / Co-Maintainer Self Introduction Bob Lightfoot
by Bob Lightfoot
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dear Devel-List:
Please consider this the initial introduction of myself as a
potential/future packager / co-maintainer.
I have been "lurking" / using Fedora for the past 7 years when
Fedora 8 released. I switched my workstation and server to CentOS
when Fedora 16 released, but continued to assist with Fedora QA
release testing and have enjoyed working with nirik, adamw, roshi,
robatino and crew. I have personally found the tools of ffmpeg, vlc
and mythtv very useful given my busy schedule and limited time for
video entertainment.
During the recent release of CentOS 7 I noticed that these
packages were not in my usual 3rd party repo, due in part to
supporting EPEL Packages not yet being branched. This led to study of
mock / rpmbuild and eventually the Fedora Packager Page found at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
. I have not yet been chosen to co-maintain anything and I am not
sure what I will package if anything, but wanted to introduce so as I
monitor mailings and contribute reviews, people had some idea who Bob
Lightfoot {boblfoot} is.
It has been some years {read 1985 - 1990} since I've used a
high level programming language {pascal, basic, rpg II} having focused
on Relay Ladder Logic and Assembly Language coding in my work life. I
recently started working more with bash script and have dabbled with
perl and python but an no where near fluent in these key languages to
date. We've come a long way since the old Trash 80's running basic,
but some things haven't changed. Write clearly and document well
never go out of style.
I hope get to know you better and be known better as I
journey into a value adding contributor.
Sincerely,
Bob Lightfoot
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT0wtFAAoJEKqgpLIhfz3XWkAH/22tz9nIo2r7ZZ/j4ABSG2qD
efsW2mJJ6NoHbgnFzc3UwY/qP3Max+tjZ/HHFNAvAHrsOg9RWKgYvz1Q/YqYHcfY
zAPY8S1ojKUn8Le97UeS7NsBk4urqRhoEVLa//XurLLg4xvaiypgXrGBnlRCqfbr
uU+fUmMJJqSCHOi8FqCWiUC1DwYkoeDqpqOb8FJ0twRhkWmyUv2a5SAArm2g+76C
k8F/oTkKNC3Kh9qYqfpQqhtHxVVcspPLiP549WpyKgHKinzqjc+6iQfHyFiH/RE2
OXk3rbYsnWsnaxcne6FpbKzc6krWlGat+n8HHSg4O7Shkf+IbBrjmL5hrEtO73E=
=8UCZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
9 years, 1 month
