devel November 2009

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

330 participants
292 discussions

Start a nNew thread

rawhide report: 20091118 changes
by Fedora compose checker 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

Compose started at Wed Nov 18 08:15:06 UTC 2009

1 0

abrt / kernel oops issue
by Nathanael D. Noblet 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

Hello, I've been running F12/rawhide from a preupgrade from F11 for a couple weeks now. I've just recently noticed the abrt feature. I started submitting the bugs it found in the kerneloops. Which has me wondering couple things. #1 - I have many many kerneloops, each stacktrace/log snippet seems fairly identical. I assume you would prefer not to get 20 identical abrt submitted bugs? Or should I submit them all? #2 - When looking at the trace it has the following line(s): Nov 10 09:15:57 iridium kernel: WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:30 __list_add+0x68/0x81() (Tainted: G W ) ... Nov 10 09:15:57 iridium kernel: Pid: 2197, comm: Xorg Tainted: G W 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.x86_64 #1 I'm wondering why it is saying it is tainted.. or maybe Tainted: G mean Good?? I don't have any closed source modules loaded as far as I know. Unless Virtualbox is closed source but I didn't think it was. Virtualbox isn't running when this happens, though the module seems to be loaded. #3 Validity of the bugs it is finding... It calls the following a kerneloops... > Nov 11 16:56:41 iridium gnome-session[2259]: WARNING: Could not parse desktop file /etc/xdg/autostart/network-manager-netbook.desktop: Key file does not have key 'Name' > Nov 11 16:56:41 iridium gnome-session[2259]: WARNING: could not read /etc/xdg/autostart/network-manager-netbook.desktop > Nov 11 16:56:42 iridium kernel: executing set pll > Nov 11 16:56:42 iridium kernel: executing set crtc timing > Nov 11 16:56:42 iridium kernel: [drm] TMDS-15: set mode 25 > Nov 11 16:56:42 iridium kernel: executing set pll > Nov 11 16:56:42 iridium kernel: executing set crtc timing > Nov 11 16:56:42 iridium kernel: [drm] TMDS-11: set mode 2f > Nov 11 16:56:42 iridium kernel: fuse init (API version 7.12) > Nov 11 16:56:43 iridium pulseaudio[2406]: pid.c: Daemon already running. > Nov 11 16:56:46 iridium restorecond: Unable to watch (/home/****/public_html/*) No such file or directory do I submit this anyway? Thanks, just rying to do my part without burying you guys in senseless bug reports.

4 5

abrt bugzilla reporting - does it work?
by Christoph Höger 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

Hi, I just wanted to report an evolution crash report with abrt. All I get (besides a stacktrace) is "libcurl failed HTTP Post". Since I suspect that libcurl generally can handle HTTP posts, I wonder if this is some general bug in abrt? Did anybody submit bugs successfully using this tool? regards Christoph

5 4

More broken deps for F11 texlive-2009
by Matthew Saltzman 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

Latest F11 texlive-2009 update complains about dependencies of the new packages (which have .fc12 version suffixes!) on libpoppler.so.5()(64bit). -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs

3 4

Broken deps for rawhide the past few days
by Jesse Keating 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning regarding broken deps in rawhide. If these emails mentioned that the deps were broken on ppc or ppc64 they can be ignored. We are no longer producing ppc/ppc64 as a primary arch, however we forgot to tag the config change that enacted this on our compose tools. We were attempting to compose ppc(64) trees with only noarch packages, and well things didn't work so hot. We should have this fixed today so that future emails about broken deps will be about actual broken deps, not broken configurations. Sorry for the mailbombing. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating _______________________________________________ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list Fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce

6 7

Re: Drop wodim, use cdrskin instead?
by Andre Robatino 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

Contrary to what the man page says, wodim doesn't automatically format DVD+RWs, so you have to fully format the disc in advance before using wodim to write it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519465

2 1

Re: [SoaS] Booting Fedora live USB on MacBookPro
by Peter Jones 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

On 11/10/2009 05:37 PM, Caryl Bigenho wrote: > > Hi, > > My MacBook is a 4,1. Will it work on my machine? A 64-bit EFI image should work on a MacBook4,1 . A 32-bit EFI image won't. -- Peter RFC 882 put the dots in .com.

2 4

Status of maven 2.2.1 update in rawhide
by Deepak Bhole 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

Hi Everyone, Sorry for the cross-list posting, but the matter is of interest to both lists afaict, as I have seen messages related to maven on both. As some of you might know, we intend to put maven 2.2.1 in rawhide. The new maven will be a completely re-written rpm, one that should be a lot easier to maintain, and much more stable. All progress related to this upgrade is now on the wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MavenUpdate Updates/new packages for dependencies will be a significant effort. Once we (Andrew Overholt, Alexander Kurtakov and myself) start work on that, we will need all the help we can get :) So if you are interested in helping, or just tracking progress -- that is the page to subscribe to/check out! I'll send one more mail to this list when work on dependencies starts. Cheers, Deepak

1 0

texlive 2009 massive dep problem today
by Neal Becker 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

Lots of errors like these: Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.11)(64bit) is needed by package texlive-luatex-bin-2009-2.15878.fc12.x86_64 (texlive) Error: Missing Dependency: libpoppler.so.5()(64bit) is needed by package texlive-jadetex-bin-2009-2.15878.fc12.x86_64 (texlive)

3 4

id3lib stack smashing
by Adrian Reber 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

There is ubuntu bug report against id3lib "libid3 crashes (stack smashing) when reading VBR MP3 file"[1]. I am able to reproduce this on ubuntu but not on Fedora and I do not understand why. The patch[2] looks like it is doing the right thing but there is not stack smashing detected using the Fedora version (even on ubuntu). I have looked at the ubuntu build logs[3] and it uses completely different compiler flags. Is one of those flags the reason for not seeing the stack smashing on Fedora? Adrian [1]https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/id3lib3.8.3/+bug/444466 [2]http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33114077/id3lib-vbr_buffer_overflow.diff [3]http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30361665/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.id3lib…

2 1

← Newer
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
30
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel November 2009