October 2015 - devel - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Roman Mohr

Hi all, I want to unretire mockito for branch epel7 and take ownership for that branch. It got retired yesterday and I require it for assert-core. It only got retired because the maintainer for that on e branch seems to be no longer interested in mockito. It is a vital package for java development. Package: mockito FAS name: rfenkhuber Following [1] a re-review should not be necessary. Best Regards, Roman [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers

8 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Final Release Candidate 10 (RC10) Available Now!

by Adam Williamson

On our modified schedule [1], Fedora 23 Final Release Candidate 10 (RC10) is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! All deities willing, this should be the last RC. The difference between RC9 and RC10 is that yelp has been downgraded to 3.17.2 to make anaconda's help pages work. The focus for RC10 should be any tests that weren't run for RC3 or RC6 or RC9, basic sanity/smoke testing, checking that anaconda help works on all images and still works properly for GNOME apps; I've tested that quite a bit myself but more testing is welcome! I've transferred results from RC3 and RC6 to the RC10 pages; coconut's results should come in a few hours, you can check RC6 pages to see which tests coconut runs and not bother duplicating them. At the Go/No-Go tomorrow we'll be deciding whether to ship RC9 or RC10, or slip again. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6266#comment:24 . Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download- ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace "dl" with "download-ib01" in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Workstation and Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Server: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Server_Test Cloud: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Cloud_Test Summary: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Summary All Alpha, Beta and Final priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the Final Release Criteria [3]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Create Fedora 23 Final test compose (TC) and release candidate (RC) https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6266 Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-23/f-23-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Final_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

BuildRequires: pythonN-devel unnecessary

by Mike Bonnet

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires This is *not* required for pure Python packages, only for packages compiling native extensions: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=6908337 Can we change this guideline to say packages should: BuildRequires: python2 and/or: BuildRequires: python3 in the general case, and only use the -devel packages if compiling extensions? Thanks, Mike Note: tried to send this to packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org but it never got past the moderator.

8 years, 6 months

6
11
0 / 0

Fedora Rawhide 20151029 compose check report

by Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images. Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151028: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Cloud disk qcow x86_64 Cloud docker x86_64 Cloud vagrant libvirt x86_64 Cloud vagrant virtualbox x86_64 Cloud_atomic disk qcow x86_64 Cloud disk raw x86_64 Cloud_atomic vagrant virtualbox x86_64 Cloud disk qcow i386 Cloud_atomic vagrant libvirt x86_64 No images in Rawhide 20151028 but not this. -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Self Introduction: Noel Barrachina

by Noel B. A.

Hola! My name is Noel and I am a Spanish linux sysadmin. I work primarily with CentOS servers and workstations. I am a former Apple employee with experience packaging software for Mac. I'd like to join the maintainers to help out and gain more experience. What prompted me to start contributing was the version of tmux on my Fedora 22. Cheers

8 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

kdbus module being removed from Rawhide

by Josh Boyer

Hi All, We will be removing the kdbus driver from Rawhide kernels before the 4.3 final release upstream. Realistically, this means kdbus will be gone from Fedora by Monday November 2nd at the latest. If you have a setup using kdbus, please adjust it accordingly. The upstream developers asked me to remove the module from Fedora while they rethink some of the approach they are taking with kdbus. josh

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Orphaning flasm

by Kevin Kofler

Hi, I am hereby orphaning the flasm (Flash bytecode assembler disassembler) package. (I am about to click the buttons in pkgdb.) I was asked to pick this up back when I picked up gnash. I have since long given up maintainership of gnash. I have never had any use for this package (not even when I was still maintaining gnash), and I have not touched it for ages. I also wonder whether anybody uses it at all. Either way, I am not the right person to maintain this package. The owner of the gnash package may want to take it up (as it is a tool that can be used to debug gnash). Or they might not have any use for it either, in which case it might be time to retire it (which will happen anyway if nobody picks it up). In any case, it is free to take. Kevin Kofler

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

apitrace-libs.i686 missing in x86_64 repos

by Sandro Mani

Hello Got bug #1266181 filed about apitrace.i686 missing in the x86_64 repos. The reporter probably meant apitrace-libs.i686, which in the past was indeed installable on x86_64. Any ideas what the reasons can be that the package disappeared? Suppose something about the "mash" step, but that's as far as I get. Thanks Sandro

8 years, 6 months

6
12
0 / 0

[Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Final Release Candidate 9 (RC9) Available Now!

by Adam Williamson

On our modified schedule [1], Fedora 23 Final Release Candidate 9 (RC9) is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! The only difference between RC6 and RC9 is that RC9 includes the correct version of fedora-release-notes. We don't really need to do a full validation run on RC9, we should just check the release-notes are as expected, and then concentrate on sanity checking - running basic installs with all the images, ideally written to real media - to ensure nothing went wonky during compose. RC7 and RC8 were failed compose attempts. As a heads-up, it's possible we'll be doing an RC10 to try and fix the anaconda help issue. Work is ongoing on that. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6266#comment:22 . Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download- ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace "dl" with "download-ib01" in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Workstation and Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Server: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Server_Test Cloud: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Cloud_Test Summary: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Summary All Alpha, Beta and Final priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the Final Release Criteria [3]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Create Fedora 23 Final test compose (TC) and release candidate (RC) https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6266 Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-23/f-23-quality-tasks.htm l [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Final_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora 23 Go/No-Go Meeting - 3rd round, on Friday, October 30th, 4PM (UTC)

by Jan Kurik

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for the third round of the Go/No-Go meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 23. The meeting is scheduled at 4PM (UTC). Please follow the [FedoCal] link to find the time of the meeting in your time-zone. [FedoCal] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/3154/ <https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/3146/> "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is called the Go/No-Go Meeting." "Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of the QA Team." For more details about this meeting see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting In the meantime, keep an eye on the Fedora 23 Final Blocker list: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/23/final/buglist Thanks for attending, Jan -- Jan Kuřík Platform & Fedora Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic _______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel October 2015