There are better ways to highlight that not to mention the examples you used already exist in Fedora.
So do we have multiple kernels in Fedora? We offer .deb variants of Fedora?
That doesn't solve the existing problem at all. There is no reason why we should have say Epiphany but exclude Apache Openoffice.
Because we moved away from OpenOffice.org towards LibreOffice, and then AOO appeared on the horizon.
Epiphany or Firefox do not share such a history. For what it is worth, I would very much like to streamline things there too, which is why I said initially: "lets not make it any worse than it already is".
(Once upon a time Epiphany had multiple backends, before it adopted WebKit as the only one [1]. So we atleast gave up on some "choice" there.)
Cheers, Debarshi
[1] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2008-April/msg00000.html