On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 21:17 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 08:51:13PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 07:44:17PM -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
To put it a different way - would you buy a car whose extended warranty won't tell you what it covers, or for how long, and tells you it's subject to change *AT ANY TIME*? If so, I think I've got some cars to sell you.
Have you ever bought a used car?
People drive cars not under warranty because they know that, if something goes wrong, they can either fix it themselves (for those who are hobby mechanics) or pay someone to fix it. The same goes for a distro; if you need an update and there is no support, you can always build it yourself or pay someone to build it for you (which is, after all, sort of the point of Free Software).
Thank you for providing the analogy that proves the Fedora project (the car dealership here) does not need to provide an LTS because the consumers (the Fedora users) can fix things themselves.
And why shouldn't the Fedora project provide a place for the consumers who fixed things themselves to share with those who can't fix things?
Exactly! Wasn't this the original idea behind Fedora?
Ralf