From my point of view, it's a good idea to move them into the *-devel package.
It's more effective and ordered for future development. Because if someone only needs a few libraries, they don't have to require the whole main package and can just require a devel package, which is the way we want it as far as I know.
Lukas
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 8:14 AM Ondrej Dubaj odubaj@redhat.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would like to start a discussion about moving unversioned *.so files back to unixODBC-devel package, as they are currently in the main package. The reason for this discussion is primary have things in order according to future rhel-9.
There will potentially be a change of moving 5 files {libodbc.so libodbcinst.so libodbcpsqlS.so libodbcmyS.so libtdsS.so} to devel package, so from the maintainers/users perspective, dependent packages will have to require also the devel package and should be rebuild as well. No other changes will be made.
There seemed to be no big reason for moving the libraries to the main package in the past, so I consider f34 as a good candidate for such a change. It would be great, if you share your opinions and concerns for this topic.
Sharing also the official documentation [1], tracker in bugzilla [2] and upcoming changes in unixODBC package [3]
Thanks!
Ondrej
[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877720 [3] https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/odubaj/rpms/unixODBC/c/7ecddca7cfcc4e014b... _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org