On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 18:22 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote:
And those "lazy" people (in quotes because there are also other reasons than laziness) would otherwise end up with no updates at all, how is that better than at least providing _some_ security fixes, even if not all gets fixed?
No updates, as well as warnings from PackageKit et al that explains that the release has gone end of life is a heck of a lot different from a continued dribble of updates that /looks/ like the release is still in good support.