Le 2019-11-14 22:01, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 4:00 PM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
On 14. 11. 19 21:32, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I proposed earlier around the major upgrade rebuilds (letting us set other modules as `buildrequires:` of `python: [ ]` for stream expansion) without actually having to build the complete python stack in the modules. That might be a really convenient strategy, honestly.
Convenient to achieve what exactly?
To achieve an easy way to deal with modular rebuilds for new Python 3 versions.
How is that different, exactly, from adding a Provides: module(modulename) for in-module packages
and letting packagers use a normal dep syntax like (foo with module(modulename)) whenever they want to express they want the module version of a particular dep?
Except for adding the opaque module object to the mix that obscures all dependency chain checks?
Regards,