On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:44 PM Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com wrote:
- Josh Boyer:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:53 AM Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com wrote:
On 25. 07. 23 16:42, Florian Weimer wrote:
- Miro Hrončok:
glibc32 codonell, fweimer, jakub, mcermak
Is this about FTBFS issues? There isn't any recent build failure in Koji, so I don't get why it's on this list?
The build currently in Rawhide was done on Fedora 36 which is end of life.
Apparently the release engineering team has not rebuilt this package in a mass rebuild at least since Fedora 35.
To remove it from the list, build the package on Rawhide please.
Or we could not, and drop i686 completely.
If we drop glibc32, we can't build any 32-bit code at all because GCC will no longer support -m32. In this regardm x86-64 is different than the other Fedora architectures which can target bare metal 32-bit even from 64-bit-only compilers.
Are bootloaders fully treated as firmware and no longer built by Fedora? At least the shim package does not come with corresponding source code AFAICS. But I expect that there are other 32-bit pre-boot packages that we still rebuild.
There's shim-unsigned* which is built in Fedora, the output of those are sent off to be signed and then the signed binaries are put into the final shim packages which don't have source code but they are still built on Fedora with the source, just in a two step process due to the out of band signing.