On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 08:25:38AM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler@chello.at wrote:
Why would we want to? Just let things going as long as there is at least one maintainer committing something. Even if not all security issues get fixed, it's better than if none gets fixed.
Ha! Keeping a branch open because one maintainer interested in something. That's not a distribution. That's a personal respository.
If it turns out that no community agregates around that idea and it is indeed a personnal repository it should be stopped, but you cannot know if you don't try.
-- Pat