-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
I've just published a fourth version[1] of the ELN proposal. With a lot of input from Miro HronĨok, I think I've finally been able to clarify some of the points that we were getting hung up on.
Changes in this version of the proposal[2]:
* Improve our explanation of why we are doing ELN in the first place * Clarify the relationship with Rawhide * Better describe what happens if packages don't build on ELN * Explain our plan for when to use conditionals (this was getting a larger share of the conversation than it warranted because we didn't do a good job of explaining that they should be the exception and not the rule) * Clarify that the time limit on PRs is only for determining if the maintainer is responsive. If they reply, the timer is cleared. * Fixed the question about upstream features to make it clear that what we meant is that new features should go upstream first, not be implemented as a fork in ELN * Added a section explaining how we will deal with side-tags * Make it clear that we don't want to diverge wherever possible and that any planned divergence should be discussed with the ELN SIG ahead of time * Cleaned up the contingency plan section.
I hope that these changes will make our position more clear. Thank you to everyone who has contributed to this discussion. I think the feedback has been very valuable and I sincerely appreciate it.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ELN_Buildroot_and_Compose [2] https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes%2FELN_Buildroot_and_Comp...
_______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedorapro...